HIPAA Compliance News

Can You Make WordPress HIPAA Compliant?

WordPress is a convenient content management system that allows websites to be quickly and easily constructed. The platform is popular with businesses, but is it suitable for use in healthcare? Can you make WordPress HIPAA compliant?

Before assessing whether it is possible to make WordPress HIPAA compliant, it is worthwhile covering how HIPAA applies to websites.

HIPAA and Websites

HIPAA does not specifically cover compliance with respect to websites, HIPAA requirements for websites are therefore a little vague.

As with any other forms of electronic capture or transmission of ePHI, safeguards must be implemented in line with the HIPAA Security Rule to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI. Those requirements apply to all websites, including those developed from scratch or created using an off-the-shelf platform such as WordPress.

Websites must incorporate administrative, physical, and technical controls to ensure the confidentiality of any protected health information uploaded to the website or made available through the site.

  • HIPAA-covered entities must ensure there are access controls in place to prevent unauthorized individuals from gaining access to PHI or to the administration control panel
  • Audit controls must be in place that log access to the site and any activity on the site that involves ePHI
  • There must be integrity controls in place that prevent ePHI from being altered or destroyed
  • Transmission security controls must be implemented to ensure any ePHI uploaded to the site is secured (and encrypted in transit) and data must be appropriately secured at rest (encrypted on a third-party server or encrypted/otherwise secured on a covered entity’s web server)
  • Physical security controls must be implemented to prevent unauthorized access to the web server
  • Administrators and any internal users should be trained on use of the website and made aware of HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules
  • The website must be hosted with a HIPAA-compliant hosting provider (or internally)
  • If a third-party hosting company is used, a business associate agreement is required

Once all the necessary controls have been implemented that satisfy the requirements of the HIPAA Security Rule, the website (and plugins) and all associated systems that interact with the site must be subjected to a risk analysis. All risks to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI must be identified and those risks and addressed via risk management processes that reduce those risks to a reasonable and acceptable level.

WordPress and Business Associate Agreements

WordPress will not sign a business associate agreement with HIPAA covered entities and there is no mention of BAAs on the WordPress site. So, does that mean that the platform cannot be used in healthcare?

A business associate agreement is not necessarily required. If you simply want to create a blog to communicate with patients, provided you do not upload any PHI to the site or collect PHI through the site (such as making appointments), a business associate agreement would not be required.

You would also not need a BAA if PHI is stored separately from the website and is accessed via a plugin. If the plugin has been developed by a third party, you would need a business associate agreement with the plugin developer.

If you want to use the website in connection with PHI, there are several steps you must take to make WordPress HIPAA compliant.

How to Make WordPress HIPAA Compliant

A standard off-the-shelf WordPress installation will not be HIPAA compliant as WordPress does not offer a HIPAA-compliant service. It is possible to make WordPress HIPAA compliant, but it will be a major challenge. You will need to ensure the following before any ePHI is uploaded to or collected through the website.

  • Perform a risk analysis prior to using the site in connection with any ePHI and reduce risks to a reasonable and acceptable level
  • Use a HIPAA compliant hosting service for your website. Simply hosting the site with a HIPAA compliant hosting provider does not guarantee compliance. Ensure that all access, audit, and integrity controls are in place and safeguards implemented to secure data at rest and in transit
  • Perform a security scan of the site to check for vulnerabilities
  • Only use plugins from trustworthy sources
  • Ensure all plugins are updated and the latest version of WordPress is installed
  • Use security plugins on the website – Wordfence for example
  • Use a SaaS provider that can interface the ePHI component into your website or develop the interface internally
  • Ensure ePHI is stored outside of WordPress
  • Set strong passwords and admin account names to reduce the potential for brute force attacks. Use rate limiting to further enhance security and use two factor authentications for administrator accounts
  • Ensure that users cannot sign up for accounts directly without first being vetted
  • Ensure any data collected via web forms is encrypted in transit
  • Obtain business associate agreements with all service providers/plugin developers who require access to ePHI or whose software touches ePHI

WordPress was not developed to confirm to HIPAA standards so making WordPress HIPAA compliant is complicated. Ensuring a WordPress site remains HIPAA compliant is similarly difficult. There have also been several security issues with WordPress over the years and vulnerabilities are frequently identified. WordPress is not the only problem. Plugins are frequently found to have vulnerabilities and there is considerable potential for those vulnerabilities to be exploited.

While it is possible to make WordPress HIPAA compliant, the potential risks to ePHI are considerable. WordPress makes website creation simple, but not as far as HIPAA compliance is concerned.

Our recommendation is to develop your own website from scratch that is easier to secure and maintain, host the site with a HIPAA compliant hosing company, and if you do not have employees with the correct skill sets, use a vendor that specializes in developing HIPAA compliant websites and patient portals.

The post Can You Make WordPress HIPAA Compliant? appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Banner Health Anticipates Potential Financial Penalty from OCR over 2016 Cyberattack

According to a financial report issued by Banner Health, OCR is investigating the colossal 2016 Banner Health data breach which saw the protected health information of 3.7 million patients exposed. The breach involved Banner Health facilities at 27 locations in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Nebraska, Nevada, and Wyoming and resulted in the exposure of highly sensitive protected health information including names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and health insurance information.

The attackers gained access to the payment processing system used in its food and beverage outlets with a view to obtaining credit card numbers. However, once access to the network was gained, they also accessed servers containing PHI.

Banner Health reports that it has cooperated with OCR’s investigation into the breach and has supplied information as requested. However, OCR was not satisfied with its response and the evidence supplied on its HIPAA compliance efforts. Specifically, OCR was not satisfied with the documentation supplied to demonstrate “past security assessment activities” with its responses rated as “inadequate”.

Banner Health has respond and provided additional evidence of its security efforts but “negative findings” are anticipated. Banner Health suspects a financial penalty may be pursued by OCR, although it is not known how much the penalty is likely to be.

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights investigates all data breaches over 500 records. OCR can issue fines of up to $1.5 million per violation category, per year. HIPAA violations that have been allowed to persist over several years, and cases where there have been multiple violations of HIPAA Rules, can see multi-million-dollar financial penalties pursued. Fines have been issued of $25,000, although there have also been settlements in excess of $4 million dollars.

Based on previous HIPAA settlements, a breach of this magnitude is likely to see a fine toward the upper end of the spectrum.

In addition to a potential fine from OCR for non-compliance with HIPAA Rules, nine lawsuits were filed by plaintiffs affected by the 2016 data breach which have since been consolidated into a single class action lawsuit.

While many data breach lawsuits have been dismissed for lack of standing, this lawsuit appears to be going the distance. The plaintiffs have already demonstrated impending injury as a result of the exposure and theft of their health information.

Banner Health holds an insurance policy against cyberattacks although the extent of insurance coverage is not known. Banner Health is vigorously defending the lawsuit, but should its efforts fail, the health system believes a substantial proportion of the legal costs and any settlement will be covered by its cyber risk insurance policy.

The post Banner Health Anticipates Potential Financial Penalty from OCR over 2016 Cyberattack appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Jail Terms for HIPAA Violations by Employees

The penalties for HIPAA violations by employees can be severe, especially those involving the theft of protected health information.

HIPAA violations by employees can attract a fine of up to $250,000 with a maximum jail term of 10 years and a 2-year jail term for aggravated identity theft.

This month there have been two notable cases of HIPAA violations by employees, one of which has resulted in a fine and imprisonment, with the other likely to result in a longer spell in prison when sentencing takes place in June.

Jail Term for Former Transformations Autism Treatment Center Employee

In February, a former Behavioral Analyst at the Transformations Autism Treatment Center (TACT) was discovered to have stolen the protected health information of patients following termination.

Jeffrey Luke, 29, of Collierville, TN gained access to a TACT Google Drive account containing the PHI of patients following termination and downloaded the PHI of 300 current and former patients onto his personal computer.

Approximately one month after Luke was terminated, TACT discovered patient information had been remotely accessed and downloaded. An investigation was launched and law enforcement was notified, with the latter alerting the FBI. Luke was identified as the perpetrator from his IP address, with the search of his residence uncovering a computer containing stolen electronic patient records and TACT forms and templates.

Luke’s access rights to Google Drive had been terminated by TACT in accordance with HIPAA Rules; however, after termination, Luke had gained access to a shared Google Drive account and authorized access from his personal Gmail account.

It is unclear exactly how that was achieved after his access rights were terminated. Court documents say Luke hacked the account and law enforcement found evidence Luke had researched how to gain access to the data.

Law enforcement discovered this was not the first time Luke had stolen data from an employer. His computer also contained patient data from another former employer – Somerville, TN-based Behavioral and Counseling Services.

Luke pleaded guilty to the charges and was sentenced to 30 days in jail and 3 years of supervised release. Luke was also ordered to pay $14,941.36 in restitution.

This case sends a message to healthcare employees considering stealing healthcare data to sell, use, or pass on to a new employer, that data theft carries stiff penalties. While Luke will only serve 30 days in jail, he will have a criminal record which will hamper future employment.

Healthcare organizations should also take precautions to minimize the opportunity for ex-employees to access PHI remotely after they have left employment. When an employment contract ends, or an employee is terminated, access to all systems must be blocked and passwords should be changed on any shared accounts.

Nursing Home Employee Pleads Guilty to Theft of Credit Card Numbers

A former employee at a nursing home in St. Louis County, MO has pleaded guilty to the theft of credit card numbers.

Shaniece Borney, 29, of St. Louis County, was employed at a NHC Health Care nursing home between 2016 and 2017. Borney abused her access to the computer system and stole the credit card details of patients. The credit card details were used to make purchases for herself and family members.

Borney faces up to 10 years in jail and could be fined up to $250,000 and will be required to pay restitution to the victims of the fraud. Borney will be sentenced on June 21, 2018.

The post Jail Terms for HIPAA Violations by Employees appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Is Liquid Web HIPAA Compliant?

Healthcare organizations searching for a hosting solution may identify Liquid Web as a potential vendor, but is Liquid Web HIPAA compliant? Can its cloud services be used by HIPAA-covered entities for hosting applications and projects that include electronic protected health information?

Any healthcare organization that wants to use the cloud to host applications that use the protected health information (PHI) of patients must select a vendor whose service includes safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI that meet the requirements of the HIPAA Security Rule.

Cloud service providers, including hosting companies, are classed as business associates since they potentially have access to their clients’ data. While many cloud service providers claim they do not access customers’ data, they are still classed as business associates. HIPAA-covered entities and their business associates must therefore enter into a business associate agreement with the service provider before any ePHI is uploaded to the cloud.

Liquid Web Business Associate Agreements

Liquid Web has been providing hosting solutions to SMBs for 20 years. Last year, the company underwent an independent audit of its hosting services to assess compliance with HIPAA/HITECH regulations. While there is no official HIPAA compliance certification, the accounting firm UHY LLP did certify that the company has implemented appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to satisfy HIPAA Rules. Liquid Web has also passed EU- US and Swiss-US Privacy Shield audits, SOC 1, 2, 3 attestations, and PCI Service Provider recertification.

Liquid Web is prepared to enter into business associate agreements with HIPAA covered entities that require hosting services for web content and applications that include PHI. The BAA covers its single server and multiple server hosting services.

Is Liquid Web HIPAA Compliant?

The privacy and security controls implemented by Liquid Web allow HIPAA covered entities to ensure their data is secure and always available. Liquid Web can be a HIPAA compliant hosting service, provided access, security, and audit controls are set appropriately and a signed business associate agreement is obtained prior to use of the hosting services in connection with any ePHI.

The post Is Liquid Web HIPAA Compliant? appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Healthcare Data Breach Statistics

We have compiled healthcare data breach statistics from October 2009 when the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights first started publishing summaries of healthcare data breaches on its website.

The healthcare data breach statistics below only include data breaches of 500 or more records as smaller breaches are not published by OCR. The breaches include closed cases and breaches still being investigated by OCR.

Our healthcare data breach statistics clearly show there has been an upward trend in data breaches over the past 9 years, with 2017 seeing more data breaches reported than any other year since records first started being published.

There have also been notable changes over the years in the main causes of breaches. The loss/theft of healthcare records and electronic protected health information dominated the breach reports between 2009 and 2015, although better policies and procedures and the use of encryption has helped reduce these easily preventable breaches. Our healthcare data breach statistics show the main causes of healthcare data breaches is now hacking/IT incidents, with unauthorized access/disclosures also commonplace.

Healthcare Data Breaches by Year

Between 2009 and 2017 there have been 2,181 healthcare data breaches involving more than 500 records. Those breaches have resulted in the theft/exposure of 176,709,305 healthcare records.  That equates to more than 50% of the population of the United States (54.25%). Healthcare data breaches are now being reported at a rate of more than one per day.

Healthcare data breaches 2019-2017

Healthcare Records Exposed by Year

While there has been a general upward trend in the number of records exposed each year, there was a massive improvement in 2017 – the best year since 2012 in terms of the number of records exposed. However, while breaches were smaller in 2017, it was a record breaking year in terms of the number of healthcare data breaches reported – 359 incidents.

Records Exposed in Healthcare data breaches

Average/Median Healthcare Data Breach Size by Year

Average Size of Healthcare Data Breaches

 

Median Size of Healthcare Data Breaches

 

Largest Healthcare Data Breaches (2009-2017)

Rank Year Entity Entity Type Records Exposed/Stolen Cause of Breach
1 2015 Anthem, Inc. Affiliated Covered Entity Health Plan 78800000 Hacking/IT Incident
2 2015 Premera Blue Cross Health Plan 11000000 Hacking/IT Incident
3 2015 Excellus Health Plan, Inc. Health Plan 10000000 Hacking/IT Incident
4 2011 Science Applications International Corporation Business Associate 4900000 Loss
5 2014 Community Health Systems Professional Services Corporation Business Associate 4500000 Theft
6 2015 University of California, Los Angeles Health Healthcare Provider 4500000 Hacking/IT Incident
7 2013 Advocate Medical Group Healthcare Provider 4029530 Theft
8 2015 Medical Informatics Engineering Business Associate 3900000 Hacking/IT Incident
9 2016 Banner Health Healthcare Provider 3620000 Hacking/IT Incident
10 2016 Newkirk Products, Inc. Business Associate 3466120 Hacking/IT Incident
11 2016 21st Century Oncology Healthcare Provider 2213597 Hacking/IT Incident
12 2014 Xerox State Healthcare, LLC Business Associate 2000000 Unauthorized Access/Disclosure
13 2011 IBM Business Associate 1900000 Unknown
14 2011 GRM Information Management Services Business Associate 1700000 Theft
15 2010 AvMed, Inc. Health Plan 1220000 Theft
16 2015 CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield Health Plan 1100000 Hacking/IT Incident
17 2014 Montana Department of Public Health & Human Services Health Plan 1062509 Hacking/IT Incident
18 2011 The Nemours Foundation Healthcare Provider 1055489 Loss
19 2010 BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc. Health Plan 1023209 Theft
20 2011 Sutter Medical Foundation Healthcare Provider 943434 Theft

Healthcare Hacking Incidents by Year

Our healthcare data breach statistics show hacking is now the leading cause of healthcare data breaches, although healthcare organizations are now much better at detecting breaches when they do occur. The low hacking/IT incidents in the earlier years is likely to be due, in part, to the failure to detected hacking incidents and malware infections quickly. Many of the hacking incidents in 2014-2017 occurred many months, and in come cases years, before they were detected.

Healthcare Data Breaches - Hacking

 

Records Exposed in Healthcare Data Breaches - Hacking

Unauthorized Access/Disclosures by Year

As with hacking, healthcare organizations are getting better at detecting internal breaches and also reporting those breaches to the Office for Civil Rights. While hacking is the main cause of breaches, unauthorized access/disclosure incidents are in close second.

Healthcare Data Breaches - unauthorized access/disclosures

 

records exposed in authorized access/disclosures

Loss/Theft of PHI and Unencrypted ePHI by Year

Our healthcare data breach statistics show HIPAA covered entities and business associates have got significantly better at protecting healthcare records with administrative, physical, and technical controls such as encryption, although unencrypted laptops and other electronic devices are still being left unsecured in vehicles and locations accessible by the public.

healthcare theft/loss data breaches

 

records exposed by healthcare theft/loss data breaches

Improper Disposal of PHI/ePHI by Year

healthcare data breaches - improper disposal incidents

 

records exposed in healthcare improper disposal incidents

 

Breaches by Entity Type

Year Provider Health Plan Business Associate Other Total
2009 14 1 3 0 18
2010 134 21 44 0 199
2011 137 20 42 1 200
2012 155 22 36 4 217
2013 199 18 56 5 278
2014 202 71 41 0 314
2015 196 62 11 0 269
2016 257 51 19 0 327
2017 288 52 19 0 359
Total 1582 318 271 10 2181

OCR Settlements and Fines for HIPAA Violations

The penalties for HIPAA violations can be severe with multi-million-dollar fines possible when violations have been allowed to persist for several years or when multiple violations of HIPAA Rules have been allowed to occur.

The penalty structure for HIPAA violations is detailed in the infographic below:

Penalty Structure for HIPAA Violations

OCR Settlements and Fines Over the Years

The data for the healthcare data breach statistics on fines and settlements can be viewed on our HIPAA violation fines page, which details all HIPAA violation fines issued by OCR between 2008 and 2018. As the graph below shows, there has been a steady increase in HIPAA enforcement over the past 9 years.

HIPAA Fines and Settlements 2008-2017

 

How Much Has OCR Fined HIPAA Covered Entities and Business Associates?

In addition to an increase in fines and settlements, the level of fines has increased substantially. Multi-million-dollar fines for HIPAA violations are now the norm.

HIPAA Fine and Settlement Amounts 2008-2017

 

average HIPAA Fines and Settlements 2008-2017

 

Median HIPAA Fines and Settlements 2008-2017

As the graphs above show, there has been a sizable increase in both the number of settlements and civil monetary penalties and the fine amounts in recent years. OCR’s budget has been cut so there are fewer resources to put into pursuing financial penalties in HIPAA violation cases. 2018 is likely to see fewer fines for HIPAA covered entities than the past two years, although settlement amounts are likely to remain high and even increase in 2018.OCR Director Roger Severino has indicated financial penalties are most likely to be pursued for particularly egregious HIPAA violations.

State Attorneys General HIPAA Fines and Other Financial Penalties for Healthcare Organizations

State attorneys general can issue fines ranging from $100 per HIPAA violation up to a maximum of $25,000 per violation category, per year.

Even when action is taken by state attorneys general over potential HIPAA violations, healthcare organizations are typically fined for violations of state laws. Only a handful of U.S. states have issued fines solely for HIPAA violations

Some of the major fines issued by state attorneys general for HIPAA violations and violations of state laws are listed below.

 

Year State Covered Entity Amount Individuals affected Settlement/CMP Reason
2018 NY EmblemHealth $575,000 81,122 Settlement Mailing error
2018 NY Aetna $1,150,000 12,000 Settlement Mailing error
2017 CA Cottage Health System $2,000,000 More than 54,000 Settlement Failure to adequately protect medical records
2017 MA Multi-State Billing Services $100,000 2,600 Settlement Theft of unencrypted laptop containing PHI
2017 NJ Horizon Healthcare Services Inc., $1,100,000 3.7 million Settlement Loss of unencrypted laptop computers
2017 VT SAManage USA, Inc. $264,000 660 Settlement Spreadsheet indexed by search engines and PHI viewable
2017 NY CoPilot Provider Support Services, Inc $130,000 221,178 Settlement Delayed breach notification
2015 NY University of Rochester Medical Center $15,000 3,403 Settlement List of patients provided to nurse who took it to a new employer
2015 CT Hartford Hospital/ EMC Corporation $90,000 8,883 Settlement Theft of unencrypted laptop containing PHI
2014 MA Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island $150,000 12,000 Settlement Loss of backup tapes containing PHI
2014 MA Boston Children’s Hospital $40,000 2,159 Settlement Loss of laptop containing PHI
2014 MA Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center $100,000 3,796 Settlement Loss of laptop containing PHI
2013 MA Goldthwait Associates $140,000 67,000 Settlement Improper disposal
2012 MN Accretive Health $2,500,000 24,000 Settlement Mishandling of PHI
2012 MA South Shore Hospital $750,000 800,000 Settlement Loss of backup tapes containing PHI
2011 VT Health Net Inc. $55,000 1,500,000 Settlement Loss of unencrypted hard drive/delayed breach notifications
2011 IN WellPoint Inc. $100,000 32,000 Settlement Failure to report breach in a reasonable timeframe
2010 CT Health Net Inc. $250,000 1,500,000 Settlement Loss of unencrypted hard drive/delayed breach notifications

The post Healthcare Data Breach Statistics appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Is Intercom HIPAA Compliant?

Intercom’s messaging software-as-a-service solutions are popular with businesses for chatting with potential customers. The solutions have potential for use in the healthcare industry for chatting with patients, but is Intercom HIPAA compliant? Can the company’s solutions be used in connection with electronic protected health information or would that constitute a violation of HIPAA Rules?

Is Intercom Prepared to Sign a Business Associate Agreement?

HIPAA covered entities and their businesses are only permitted to use software products and services in connection with electronic protected health information if there are safeguards in place to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of ePHI. Any software platform must incorporate audit and access controls and data must be appropriately secured in transit and at rest.

Before software-as-a-service can be used to send or store ePHI, a HIPAA covered entity must enter into a business associate agreement with the service provider in which the company’s responsibilities under HIPAA are explained.

There are exceptions for certain service providers such as ISPs. ISPs are exempt under the HIPAA Conduit Exception Rule. Messaging services such as those provided by Intercom are not exempt and business associate agreements would need to be obtained before the service can be used.

In Intercom’s terms and conditions it is made clear that Intercom does not consider itself a business associate and will not sign a business associate agreement with HIPAA covered entities. The company also explains that the platform should not be used for collecting, storing, processing, or transmitting sensitive personal information.

Is Intercom HIPAA Compliant?

At present, Intercom does not class itself as a business associate and will not sign a business associate agreement with HIPAA covered entities and the platform does not have the necessary privacy and security controls to be used in connection with electronic protected health information.

Consequently, Intercom is not HIPAA compliant and should not be used by healthcare organizations for sending or storing any ePHI.

The post Is Intercom HIPAA Compliant? appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

What is a HIPAA Violation?

A HIPAA violation refers to the failure to comply with HIPAA rules, which can include unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI), failure to provide patients with access to their PHI, lack of safeguards to protect PHI, failure to conduct regular risk assessments, or insufficient employee training on HIPAA rules. To best answer the question what is a HIPAA violation, it is necessary to explain what HIPAA is, who it applies to, and what the definition of a HIPAA violation is; for although most people believe they know what a HIPAA compliance violation is, evidence suggests otherwise.

In this article we provide a detailed explanation of HIPAA violations.

Ten Most Common HIPAA ViolationsYou can also use the article in conjunction with our HIPAA Violations Checklist to understand what is required to ensure full compliance. Please use the form on this page to arrange your free copy of the checklist.

HIPAA Violation Misunderstandings

The evidence that there may be a misunderstanding about what a HIPAA violation is comes from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Enforcement Highlights web page. The web page is regularly updated with statistics relating to complaints about HIPAA violations, compliance reviews, and enforcement action.

According to the most recent update, the HHS has received almost 300,000 complaints since the compliance date of the Privacy Rule (April 2003). On its behalf, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has conducted tens of thousands of compliance reviews or intervened with technical assistance before a review was necessary.

However, in more than 200,000 cases, complaints received by HHS have not been reviewed by OCR for reasons such as the entity alleged to have violated HIPAA was not a HIPAA Covered Entity, or the alleged activity did not violate HIPAA rules. Additionally, in nearly 14,000 cases in which reviews were carried out, no violation of HIPAA was found.

While these statistics imply more than two-thirds of people do not understand what is a HIPAA violation, it is important to put the statistics into context as they only relate to complaints received by the HHS and do reflect complaints made directly to Covered Entities and State Attorney Generals by patients, plan members, and members of the workforce.. Nonetheless, it may be important for some to review their interpretation of what constitutes a violation.

What is HIPAA and Who Does It Apply To?

What is a HIPAA violationThe Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) was introduced primarily to ensure employees could maintain healthcare coverage between jobs and not be discriminated against for pre-existing conditions. To prevent insurance carriers passing on the cost of compliance to plan members and employers, Congress added a second Title to the Act to simplify the administration of healthcare, eliminate wastage, and prevent healthcare fraud.

Since the passage of HIPAA, most of the regulatory activity has revolved around the Administrative Simplification provisions in 45 CFR Parts 160,162, and 164. These “Parts” include the General HIPAA Provisions, the Transaction and Code Sets Rules, and – most importantly in the context of what is a HIPAA violation – the publication of the Privacy Rule, the Security Rule, and Breach Notification Rule.

The failure to comply with any Standards in these Rules is considered a violation of HIPAA – even if no harm has resulted. For example, one of the most common types of complaint relates to the failure to provide patients with copies of their PHI on request. Examples of other types of HIPAA violations are provided below along with the penalties that may be applied when a violation of HIPAA occurs.

The Standards apply to Covered Entities and Business Associates. Covered Entities are defined as health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, and healthcare providers who electronically transmit PHI in connection with transactions for which HHS has adopted standards. Most healthcare providers qualify as a Covered Entity, but it is important to be aware that some are exempted.

Business Associates are businesses with whom a Covered Entity shares PHI to help carry out its healthcare activities and functions. Since the publication of the Final Omnibus Rule in 2013, Business Associates have had the same requirements as Covered Entities to comply with the Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules as found in 45 CFR Parts 160, 162, and 164.

What is a PHI Violation?

Violations of HIPAA involving the unauthorized disclosure of PHI beyond the permitted uses and disclosures are the most common type of HIPAA violation. PHI violations can range from providing more information than the minimum necessary to achieve the purpose of an allowable disclosure to the hacking of an unencrypted database that exposes the PHI of thousands of patients.

To avoid a PHI violation, Covered Entities and Business Associates not only need to implement the safeguards stipulated by the Privacy and Security Rules, but also ensure appropriate policies and procedures are in place to minimize the risk of a PHI violation. Members of each entity´s workforce also need to be trained on the policies and procedures and the sanctions for non-compliance.

Other Types of HIPAA Law Violation

One frequent misunderstanding about HIPAA is that a violation is only a violation when it involves authorized uses and disclosures of PHI. However, there are many other ways in which a Covered Entity or Business Associate can violate HIPAA. For example, failing to train members of the workforce on policies and procedures or failing to document the training.

It is also a HIPAA law violation to withhold the details of a breach from the individuals affected by the breach, the HHS´ Office for Civil Rights, and – in certain circumstances – from the media. In recent years, several fines have been issued for HIPAA law violations attributable to non-compliance with the Breach Notification Rule or for failing to comply with the Rule in the time allowed.

Further HIPAA Violation Examples

In addition to the examples previously mentioned, there are many more ways in which Covered Entities and Business Associates can violate HIPAA. Below we list a selection of further HIPAA violation examples:

  • Impermissible disclosures of PHI
  • Improper disposal of PHI
  • Failure to conduct a risk analysis
  • Failure to manage risks to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of PHI
  • Failure to implement safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of PHI
  • Failure to maintain and monitor PHI access logs
  • Failure to enter into a HIPAA-compliant Business Associate Agreement prior to sharing PHI
  • Failure to provide patients with an accounting of disclosures on request
  • Failure to implement access controls to limit who can view PHI
  • Failure to terminate access rights to PHI when no longer required
  • Failure to provide security awareness training
  • Unauthorized release of PHI to individuals not authorized to receive the information
  • Sharing of PHI online or via social media without permission
  • Mishandling and mis-mailing PHI
  • Texting unencrypted PHI
  • Failure to encrypt PHI or use an alternative, equivalent measure to prevent unauthorized access/disclosure

It is important that anybody with access to PHI in an organization is provided with HIPAA training that explains what is a HIPAA violation and that all members of a Covered Entity´s or Business Associate´s workforce are provided with security awareness training regardless of their role.

How are HIPAA Violations Uncovered?

What is a HIPAA compliance ViolationMany HIPAA violations are discovered by HIPAA-covered entities through internal audits. Supervisors may identify employees who have violated HIPAA Rules and employees often self-report HIPAA violations and potential violations by co-workers.

The HHS’ Office for Civil Rights is the main enforcer of HIPAA Rules and investigates complaints of HIPAA violations reported by healthcare employees, patients, and health plan members. OCR also investigates all Covered Entities that report breaches of more than 500 records, conducts investigations into certain smaller breaches, and periodically audits HIPAA-covered entities and business associates.

State attorneys general also have the power to investigate breaches, and investigations are often conducted due to complaints about potential HIPAA violations and when reports of breaches of patient records are received.

What are the Penalties for Violations of HIPAA Rules?

The penalties for violations of HIPAA rules are dependent on the nature of the violation, the level of culpability, how much harm was caused by the violation, and the efforts made by the Covered Entity or Business Associate to mitigate the breach or its impact. In most cases, the penalties consist of a Corrective Action Plan, but the OCR has the power to impose substantial financial penalties.

State attorneys general also have the power to investigate breaches, and investigations are often conducted due to complaints about potential HIPAA violations and when reports of breaches of patient records are received. These are in addition to any penalties for violations of HIPAA rules that are issued by individual states when data breaches violate state privacy and security rules.

HIPAA Violation Categories

There are four HIPAA violation categories. Each has a minimum and maximum “limit” within which OCR can impose financial penalties depending on the level of culpability. Two of the HIPAA violation categories are designated for Covered Entities and Business Associates that can demonstrate reasonable due diligence, whereas the other two are for entities guilty of willful neglect.

Category 1 – Unaware of the HIPAA violation and by exercising reasonable due diligence would not have known HIPAA rules had been violated.

Category 2 – Reasonable cause that the Covered Entity/Business Associate knew about – or should have known about – the violation by exercising reasonable due diligence.

Category 3 – Willful neglect of the HIPAA Rules with the violation corrected and the consequences mitigated within thirty days of discovery.

Category 4 – Willful neglect of the HIPAA Rules and no effort made to correct the violation or mitigate the consequences within thirty days of discovery.

HIPAA Violation Penalties

Originally, the financial HIPAA violation penalties were modest and did not act as an appropriate deterrent to prevent HIPAA-covered entities from violating the HIPAA Rules. They were significantly increased in the HITECH Act of 2009; and, since 2015, they have been adjusted for inflation annually. The table below shows the HIPAA violation penalties for 2023 and includes the maximum an entity can be fined for multiple instances of the same violation. The cost-of-living adjustment multiplier is expected to be set by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) by January 15, 2023.

Penalty Tier Level of Culpability Minimum Penalty per Violation Maximum Penalty per Violation Annual Penalty Limit 
Tier 1 Reasonable Efforts $137 $68,928 $2,067,813
Tier 2 Lack of Oversight $1,379 $68,928 $2,067,813
Tier 3 Neglect – Rectified within 30 days $13,785 $68,928 $2,067,813
Tier 4 Neglect – Not Rectified within 30 days $68,928 $2,067,813 $2,067,813

OCR Reinterprets HITECH Act Penalty Increases

As the above table shows, the maximum penalty per year is the same in all four penalty tiers, which may seem odd. In 2019, the HHS reexamined the text of the HITECH Act and determined that the language had been misinterpreted with respect to the penalty amounts, and OCR determined that the maximum penalty per year should be reduced in three of the four penalty tiers, and set the annual cap at $25,000 for tier 1, $100,000 for tier 2, $250,000 for tier 3, and $1,500,000 for tier 4.

These new maximum penalties have not been made official, as that requires further rulemaking. While that does appear to be the intention of the HHS, this has currently been addressed through a notice of enforcement discretion, which applies indefinitely until the change to the penalty structure is made official. There is still a discrepancy between the maximum penalty per violation in tier 1, which is double that of the annual cap, which will no doubt be clarified in further rulemaking. Adjusted for inflation, the new penalty amounts for 2023, for cases assessed on or after October 6, 2023, are detailed in the table below.

Annual Penalty Limit  Annual Penalty Limit  Minimum Penalty per Violation Maximum Penalty per Violation Annual Penalty Limit 
Tier 1 Lack of Knowledge $137 $34,464 $34,464
Tier 2 Reasonable Cause  $1,379 $68,928 $137,886
Tier 3 Willful Neglect $13,785 $68,928 $344,638
Tier 4 Willful neglect (not corrected within 30 days $68,928 $68,928 $2,067,813

Recognized Security Practices

In 2021, the HITECH Act was amended to encourage HIPAA-regulated entities to adopt ´recognized security practices` to better protect healthcare data from unauthorized access. If those security practices have been adopted and have been in place continuously for 12 months, they will be considered by OCR when deciding on financial penalties and other actions in response to data incidents. HIPAA-regulated entities that adopt recognized security practices will not avoid financial penalties for HIPAA Security Rule violations, but they will be considered as a mitigating factor and will see any financial penalties reduced. By adopting recognized security practices, HIPAA-regulated entities will also be subjected to less extensive audits and investigations.

FAQs

How can you tell if an organization is in violation of HIPAA?

It is not always easy to tell if an organization is in violation of HIPAA if, as a health plan member or patient, you are unfamiliar with your rights or the permissible uses and disclosures of PHI. In most cases, individuals are not aware that an organization has been in violation of HIPAA until they receive a breach notification letter. However, if you are unsure about whether an organization is in violation of HIPAA, there are several steps you can take.

Health plan members and patients who believe their privacy may have been violated should, in the first instance, file a complaint with the organization concerned. The organization should acknowledge the complaint and respond with either an explanation of why your privacy was not violated or – if it was – an explanation of what the organization is doing to rectify the cause of the violation.

Complaints can also be filed with the HHS’ Office for Civil Rights or your state´s Attorney General. These agencies have the authority to review complaints against HIPAA covered entities and business associates; and, although it may take longer to get a reply, HHS´ Office for Civil Rights and state Attorneys General can thoroughly investigate if an organization is in violation of HIPAA and take action accordingly.

What is the difference between a risk assessment and a risk analysis?

The difference between a risk assessment and a risk analysis is that a risk assessment is generally regarded to be a review of potential threats, and a risk analysis a calculation of how likely the threats are to occur. There is a lack of clarity in HIPAA about the difference between a risk assessment and a risk analysis inasmuch as the risk analysis section of the Security Rule (45 CFR § 164.308(a)) states:

Covered entities and business associates must conduct an accurate and thorough assessment of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of electronic protected health information held by the covered entity or business associate – i.e., the Rule requires an analysis of risks, but doesn´t elaborate on the analysis process.

Who can violate HIPAA?

Anyone covered by the HIPAA regulations can violate HIPAA. However, there has been some confusion – especially during the COVID-19 pandemic – about who exactly is covered by HIPAA. Entities required to comply with HIPAA are health plans, healthcare clearinghouses, and healthcare organizations that engage in qualifying electronic transactions (most now do). Business Associates and contractors with who PHI is shared can also violate HIPAA.

The requirement to comply with HIPAA regulations also applies to all workforces of a Covered Entity, Business Associate, or contractor. HIPAA defines a workforce as “employees, volunteers, trainees, and other persons whose conduct, in the performance of work for a Covered Entity or Business Associate, is under the direct control of such Covered Entity or Business Associate, whether or not they are paid by the Covered Entity or Business Associate”.

When potential risks and vulnerabilities are identified, what happens next?

When potential risks and vulnerabilities are identified, covered entities and business associates are required to implement security measures sufficient to reduce risks and vulnerabilities to a reasonable and appropriate level. In order to determine what constitutes a “reasonable and appropriate level”, organizations should take into account (per 45 CFR § 164.306(b)):

  • The size, complexity, and capabilities of the organization
  • The organization´s technical infrastructure, hardware, and software security capabilities
  • The cost of reasonable and appropriate security measures
  • The probability and criticality of potential risks to the integrity of ePHI

What does the “criticality of potential risks” mean?

The term criticality of potential risks refers to the scale of injury that might be caused by a HIPAA violation. For example, a cloud storage volume – containing the payment details and Social Security numbers of thousands of patients – left open to the public Internet has the potential to cause more injury than two nurses discussing the treatment options for patient A within earshot of patient B.

What is the HIPAA Law?

The term HIPAA Law refers to all five Titles of the Healthcare Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The relevant Title for organizations in the healthcare industry is Title II – “Preventing Health Care Fraud and Abuse; Administrative Simplification; Medical Liability Reform” – as this is the section which led to the HIPAA Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules.

What is considered a HIPAA violation?

A HIPAA violation is considered to be non-compliance with any “required” standard or any “addressable” standard for which an equally effective substitute has not been implemented, or a documented reason exists for the standard not to be implemented. An example of non-compliance with a required standard is failing to provide security awareness training to all members of the workforce regardless of their role.

Can a non-medical person violate HIPAA?

A non-medical person can violate because HIPAA applies to covered entities and business associates, and their workforces. Therefore, if a non-medical member of the workforce (such as a member of the IT team) disclosed PHI without authorization, they would be in violation of HIPAA – although it would be their employer who would have to notify the affected individual and report the disclosure to HHS´ Office for Civil Rights.

What are HIPAA violations?

HIPAA violations (in the plural) are a series of violations often attributable to the failure of a Covered Entity to monitor compliance with policies and procedures. There have been cases in which non-compliant short-cuts have been taken by employees “to get the job done”, and when shortcuts are unchecked, they can develop into a cultural norm of non-compliance.

Who can violate HIPAA laws?

Nobody can violate HIPAA laws, although there are many exceptions to HIPAA which mean covered entities and business associates do not have to comply with HIPAA in every circumstance. For example, under the Military Command Exception, healthcare professionals in the military are allowed to disclose PHI without the patient´s authorization in order to report on the patient´s fitness for duty, fitness to perform an assignment, or fitness to perform another activity necessary for a military mission.

What constitutes a HIPAA violation?

What constitutes a HIPAA violation is usually defined as any violation of the Privacy, Security, or Breach Notification Rules. Some violations – such as “incidental uses and disclosures” – would not generally result in financial penalties. Members of the workforce who violate HIPAA in this way are likely to be required to undergo further training.

What are the 3 types of HIPAA violations?

The 3 types of HIPAA violations are administrative, civil, and criminal violations. Most administrative HIPAA violations are investigated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), while civil HIPAA violations are investigated by the HHS´ Office for Civil Rights (OCR). If the Office for Civil Rights investigates a case with possible criminal motives, the case is referred to the Department of Justice for investigation.

What violates HIPAA according to CMS?

What violates HIPAA according to CMS is the failure to comply with the Administrative Requirements (Part 162 of the Administrative Simplification Regulations). The Administrative Requirements cover the code sets and identifiers Covered Entities or Business Associates acting on their behalf must use when conducting transactions for which HHS has published standards. Although CMS has the authority to issue fines for non-compliance, to date, administrative HIPAA violations have been resolved by corrective actions, not financial penalties.

What counts as a HIPAA violation according to the FTC?

Nothing counts as a HIPAA violation according to the FTC. However, while the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is not concerned with HIPAA enforcement, the agency does enforce the Federal Trade Commission Act, which has a Health Data Breach Rule that allows the FTC to pursue financial penalties for failures to issue breach notifications by vendors of personal health records and related entities not covered by HIPAA. In 2023, the FTC imposed its first financial penalty for failing to notify individuals about the impermissible disclosure of consumers’ health data to third parties, after a vendor promised such information would be kept private.

What is not a HIPAA violation?

The list of alleged violations that are not a HIPAA violation is very long indeed. More than two-thirds of complaints received by HHS´ Office for Civil Rights (OCR) alleging HIPAA violations are rejected after review because the complaints are made against organizations that are not subject to the HIPAA Rules or do not relate to an impermissible use or disclosure of Protected Health Information.

Can HIPAA violations be criminal?

A HIPAA violation can be criminal when an individual knowingly and wrongfully uses or discloses PHI in violation of §1320d-6 of the Social Security Act. Violations of this nature are most often referred to the Department of Justice, who has the authority to impose fines of up to $250,000 and pursue custodial sentences of up to ten years.

Does HIPAA apply to everyone?

HIPAA applies to everyone who is a member of a group health plan or who is a patient of a healthcare provider that qualifies as a covered entity inasmuch as it protects the privacy of these peoples´ individually identifiable health information and ensures the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of these peoples´ electronic Protected Health Information.

With regards to complying with the HIPAA Rules, HIPAA does not apply to everyone. Only “covered entities” and “business associates” with whom Protected Health Information is shared are required to comply with the HIPAA Rules. Members of the workforce for both types of organization have to comply with the policies and procedures developed by their employers to comply with HIPAA.

Can a patient violate HIPAA?

A patient cannot violate HIPAA because they do not qualify as a HIPAA covered entity, a business associate to a covered entity, or a member of the workforce. Even if a patient is employed by the hospital at which they are a patient, they cannot violate HIPAA because an employee is only a member of a covered entity´s workforce while “in the performance of work […] under the control of such covered entity”.

How do you report a HIPAA violation?

How you report a HIPAA violation can vary depending on whether you are a patient or group plan member, or a member of a covered entity´s or business associate´s workforce. If you are a patient or group plan member, you have the options of reporting a HIPAA violation to the Privacy Office where the violation occurred, to your state Attorney General, or to HHS´ Office for Civil Rights.

If you are a member of a covered entity´s or business associate´s workforce, who you report a HIPAA violation to may be determined by the content of your employment contract (i.e., an immediate supervisor). In the event of there being no reporting policy in the employment contract, your options are the same as a patient or group plan member.

What is the penalty for a HIPAA violation?

The penalty for a HIPAA violation depends on the nature of the violation, it´s consequences, the previous compliance history of the perpetrator, and whether the perpetrator is an organization or a member of an organization´s workforce.

If an organization, a minor HIPAA violation with minimal consequences will likely be resolved by technical assistance or a corrective action plan. If the violation is more serious, impacts thousands of individuals, and is a repeat offense, the likely penalty will be a civil monetary penalty.

If you are a member of an organization´s workforce, the penalty will depend on your employer´s sanctions policy. A minor violation may result in a verbal warning, while a more serious violation may result in a written warning – or, if a repeated serious violation, termination of employment.

What are the HIPAA violation categories?

The HIPAA violation categories are administrative violations, civil violations, and criminal violations. An example of an administrative violation would be to use the wrong codes on a claims transaction, while an example of a civil HIPAA violation would be to deny a patient access to a copy of their Protected Health Information (data breaches also fall into the category of civil HIPAA violations).

A criminal HIPAA violation is when a covered entity, business associate, or a member of either´s workforce has wrongfully and knowingly accessed, obtained, or transmitted Protected Health Information without authorization for a purpose prohibited by §1320d-6 of the Social Security Act. Criminal violations of HIPAA can incur substantial fines and jail sentences.

Is a HIPAA violation a felony?

A HIPAA violation is not a felony unless it involves the knowing and willful disclosure of PHI under false pretenses and/or to sell, transfer, or use the PHI for personal gain, malicious harm, or commercial advantage. These violations were classified as felonies in an opinion published by the Attorney General´s Office of Legal Counsel in 2005.

Can a family member violate HIPAA?

A family cannot violate HIPAA because family members are not required to comply with HIPAA. However, if a family member is employed at (for example) a hospital as a member of a covered entity´s workforce; and, while performing their role as a member of a covered entity´s workforce, accesses the medical history of a patient without authorization, this is a violation of HIPAA.

How long do you have to report a HIPAA violation?

How long you have to report a HIPAA violation can vary depending on who you report it to. Usually there are three options – to a Privacy Officer, to a State Attorney General, or to HHS´ Office for Civil Rights. Privacy Officers and State Attorney General can set their own time limits for how long you have to report a HIPAA violation. HHS´ Office for Civil Rights only accepts reports for 180 days after the date on which the violation was discovered.

What are the consequences of violating HIPAA?

The consequences of violating HIPAA depend on the nature of the violation, the impact the violation has, the violator´s previous compliance history, and whether the violator is an organization or a member of an organization´s workforce.

If an organization violates HIPAA, the consequences can range from voluntary compliance to technical assistance, to a corrective action plan, to a fine. Comparatively few violations of HIPAA result in a fine. Most are resolved by voluntary compliance and technical assistance.

If a member of an organization´s workforce violates HIPAA, the consequences will be determined by the organization´s HIPAA sanctions policy. These can range from a verbal warning to retraining, to a written warning, to termination of employment and possible loss of license.

My HIPAA rights were violated. Who do I complain to?

If your HIPAA rights were violated, you should complain to the Privacy Officer at the organization where your rights were violated. The contact details of the Privacy Office are on the Notice of Privacy Practices given to you when you first enrolled as a patient of a healthcare provider or as a member of a group health plan.

If you fail to obtain a satisfactory explanation of why your HIPAA rights were violated and what the organization is doing to prevent a repeat, you can complain to HHS´ Office for Civil Rights via the complaints portal. However, please note you only have 180 days from the date your HIPAA rights were violated to file your complaint.

Is violating HIPAA illegal?

Violating HIPAA is not illegal unless it involves one of the three offences that qualify as a misdemeanor or felony under §1320d-6 of the Social Security Act. All three offences relate to the knowing and wrongful disclosure of PHI, and it is rare these offenses occur. Therefore, practically all violations of HIPAA are civil violations.

What are 3 common HIPAA violations?

The 3 most common HIPAA violations according to HHS´ Enforcement Highlights report are impermissible uses and disclosures of PHI, a lack of safeguards for PHI, and the lack of patient access to PHI. Strictly speaking, these are the 3 most common alleged HIPAA violations; but it is highly likely the majority of allegations in each category are justified.

What happens if a doctor violates HIPAA?

What happens if a doctor violates HIPAA depends on whether the doctor is a covered entity, a member of a covered entity´s workforce, or a business associate providing a service on behalf of a covered entity.

With regards to the doctor being a covered entity, it is important to be aware not all healthcare provides qualify as covered entities. Those that do not qualify as a covered entity are not required to comply with HIPAA unless they provide a service for a covered entity as a business associate.

If a doctor is a covered entity in their own right (i.e., a solo practitioner), if HHS´ Office for Civil Rights investigates and identifies a compliance issue, it will usually attempt to resolve the issue with voluntary compliance or technical assistance. If the violation is serious – or the doctor has a history of non-compliance – the agency may impose a corrective action plan or civil monetary penalty.

If the doctor is a member of a covered entity´s workforce, the likely consequences of a minor HIPAA violation is a verbal warning and refresher training. However, if the doctor has a history of non-compliance, the warning could be written, and – if the violation is repeated – the covered entity could terminate the doctor´s employment and refer them to a medical licensing board.

A doctor that does not qualify as a covered entity but provides a service on behalf of a covered entity will only be required to comply with some standards of the Privacy Rule (usually determined by the content of the Business Associate Agreement). If the doctor violates a HIPAA standard they are required to comply with, the incident should be reported to the covered entity, who will investigate the violation or refer it to HHS´ Office for Civil Rights.

What is the penalty for violating HIPAA laws?

The penalty for violating HIPAA laws can depend on multiple factors. These include – but are not limited to – who committed the violation, what the consequences of the violation were, and the previous compliance history of the person or organization that violated HIPAA.

If, for example, a member of a covered entity´s workforce accidently revealed more than the minimum necessary PHI with limited consequences and it was their first violation, the penalty will likely be a verbal warning and possible a session of refresher training.

At the other end of the scale, if an organization with a poor compliance history is responsible for the knowing disclosure of PHI for commercial advantage, it could face multimillion dollar fines from HHS´ Office for Civil Rights, State Attorneys General, and the Department of Justice – who could also pursue a criminal conviction against the perpetrators with a potential jail term of up to ten years.

How does a HIPAA Privacy Rule violation differ from a HIPAA Security Rule violation?

A HIPAA Privacy Rule violation differs from a HIPAA Security Rule violation inasmuch as the objectives of the Privacy Rule are to protect the privacy of individually identifiable health information and give individuals rights over their health information, while the objective of the Security Rule is to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and confidentiality of electronic Protected Health Information – which is a subset of individually identifiable health information.

Consequently, a HIPAA Privacy Rule violation is most likely to be the violation of a standard relating to permissible uses and disclosures of Protected Health Information or the failure to allow individuals to exercise their rights, whereas a HIPAA Security Rule violation is most likely to the violation of a standard relating to an Administrative, Physical, or Technology Safeguard – for example, the failure to prevent members of the workforce sharing login credentials.

Can I get fired for an accidental HIPAA violation?

You can get fired for an accidental HIPAA violation if, as a member of a covered entity´s or business associate´s workforce – you have a previous history of accidental HIPAA violations with significant consequences. However, unless your first accidental HIPAA violation had particularly significant consequences, and your employer´s sanctions policy included being fired for a first offense, you will likely be sanctioned with a verbal or written warning and required to take refresher HIPAA training.

How long does a HIPAA violation investigation take?

How long a HIPAA violation investigation takes can depend on a number of factors. If, for example, a healthcare worker has accidently violated a Privacy Rule standard and the consequences were minimal, a HIPAA violation investigation may take less than thirty minutes. However, if an investigation into a data breach by HHS´ Office for Civil Rights uncovers non-compliance in multiple areas, a HIPAA investigation could take months to conclude.

Can you sue for a HIPAA violation?

You cannot sue for a HIPAA violation under HIPAA laws because the regulations do not provide for a private right of action. However, if you have suffered harm as the consequence of a HIPAA violation, there may be other consumer protection or privacy laws you may be able to use to sue for a HIPAA violation against a negligent covered entity or business associate. Ideally, you should seek advice from a legal expert who is familiar with the laws in your state.

Do I need an attorney to report a HIPAA violation?

You do not need an attorney to report a HIPAA violation because the process for filing a complaint via the OCR complaints portal is straightforward. However, if you wish to pursue a civil claim for a violation of your privacy rights, it may be a good idea to speak with a HIPAA violation attorney before filing your complaint as HIPAA does not provide for a private right of action.

The post What is a HIPAA Violation? appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Is it a HIPAA Violation to Email Patient Names?

We have been asked is it a HIPAA violation to email patient names and other protected health information? In answer to this and similar questions, we will clarify how HIPAA relates to email and explain some of the precautions HIPAA covered entities and healthcare employees should take to ensure compliance when using email to send electronic protected health information.

Is it a HIPAA Violation to Email Patient Names?

Patient names (first and last name or last name and initial) are one of the 18 identifiers classed as protected health information (PHI) in the HIPAA Privacy Rule.

HIPAA does not prohibit the electronic transmission of PHI. Electronic communications, including email, are permitted, although HIPAA-covered entities must apply reasonable safeguards when transmitting ePHI to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of data.

It is not a HIPAA violation to email patient names per se, although patient names and other PHI should not be included in the subject lines of emails as the information could easily be viewed by unauthorized individuals. Even when messages are protected with encryption in transit, message headers – which include the subject line and to and from fields – are often not encrypted and could potentially be intercepted and viewed.

Patients names and other PHI should only be sent to individuals authorized to receive that information, so care must be taken to ensure the email is addressed correctly. Sending an email containing PHI to an incorrect recipient would be an unauthorized disclosure and a violation of HIPAA.

Must all Emails Containing PHI be Encrypted?

HIPAA does not require the use of encryption. Encryption is only an addressable standard. However, if, following a risk assessment, the decision is taken not to use encryption, an alternative and equivalent security measure must be used in its place.

In the case of internal emails, it would not be necessary for messages containing ePHI to be encrypted provided the messages are only sent via an internal email system and do not leave the protection of a firewall. Access controls would also need to be in place to prevent messages from being opened by individuals not authorized to receive the information.

If emails containing PHI are sent outside the protection of an internal network there is considerable potential for PHI to be viewed by unauthorized individuals. This is not a problem when emailing patients, provided consent to use email to send PHI has been obtained from the patient in advance. The patient must have been made aware of the risks of sending PHI via unencrypted email and must have given authorization to use such a potentially insecure method of communication.

Emailing ePHI to all other individuals using unencrypted email is a risky strategy. While HIPAA encryption requirements are somewhat vague, in the event of a HIPAA audit or data breach investigation, it would be hard to argue that ePHI sent via unencrypted mail was reasonably protected, especially when there are many secure methods of data sharing available – Dropbox, Google Drive, Box etc.

The post Is it a HIPAA Violation to Email Patient Names? appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

2018 HIPAA Changes and Enforcement Outlook

Are there likely to be major 2018 HIPAA changes? What does this year have in store in terms of new HIPAA regulations? OCR Director Roger Severino has hinted there could be some 2018 HIPAA changes and that HIPAA enforcement in 2018 is unlikely to slowdown.

Are Major 2018 HIPAA Changes Likely?

The Trump administration has made it clear that there should be a decrease rather than an increase in regulation in the United States. In January 2017, Trump signed an executive order calling for a reduction in regulation, which was seen to be hampering America’s economic growth. At the time Trump said, “If there’s a new regulation, they have to knock out two. But it goes far beyond that, we’re cutting regulations massively for small business and for large business.”

While Trump was not specifically referring to healthcare, it is clear we are currently in a period of deregulation. Trump’s words were recently echoed by Severino at the HIMSS conference who confirmed the HSS understands deregulation in some areas is required before further regulations can be introduced.

Therefore, there are unlikely to be major 2018 HIPAA changes, at lease not in terms of increased regulation. What is more likely is an easing of the administrative burden on healthcare organizations in 2018.

OCR is currently reviewing existing HIPAA regulations to determine whether all aspects of HIPAA Rules are still relevant and if there are any areas where the administrative burden on healthcare organizations can be eased. OCR is looking at the benefit of various provisions of HIPAA and whether those benefits outweigh the costs.

The HHS has said its goals are “reducing the burden of compliance” and “streamlining its regulations,” while promoting “meaningful information sharing”.

2018 HIPAA changes could make life simpler for many healthcare organizations as the HHS attempts to minimize duplication and burdensome requirements and eliminate outdated restrictions and obsolete regulations.

HIPAA Enforcement in 2018

In 2016 there was a significant increase in HIPAA enforcement activities by OCR with more settlements reached with covered entities and business associates than any other year since the HIPAA Enforcement Rule was signed into law. In 2016 there were 12 settlements and one civil monetary penalty issued and 2017 HIPAA settlements were well above average levels, with 9 settlements and one civil monetary penalty. So, what can we expect for HIPAA enforcement in 2018?

At HIMSS 2018, Roger Severino gave a presentation on HIPAA compliance, enforcement, and policy updates from the Office for Civil Rights and made it clear OCR will continue to pursue settlements with HIPAA covered entities for egregious violations of HIPAA Rules. Severino said OCR still has the same enforcement mindset and that there will be “no slowdown in our enforcement efforts,” and “we’re still looking for big, juicy, egregious cases.” That does not necessarily mean large healthcare organizations. OCR treats potential HIPAA violations on a case by case basis, and smaller healthcare organizations may similarly be punished if they are discovered to have violated HIPAA Rules.

Severino said OCR does not want to fine healthcare organizations for violating HIPAA Rules and wants the settlements to reduce, but for that to happen, healthcare organizations must improve their compliance programs. 2018 HIPAA enforcement is likely to continue to see financial penalties issued for common HIPAA violations such as the failure to conduct regular risk assessments.  Already, 2018 has seen two settlements announced. A $100,000 penalty for Filefax, Inc., and a $3,500,000 settlement with Fresenius Medical Care North America. Time will tell if this was a blip or if that pace will be maintained throughout the year.

OCR is not the only enforcer of HIPAA Rules. State attorneys general can also issue fines for HIPAA violations, and the New York AG has been active in this area in recent weeks, fining EmblemHealth $575,000 in March and Aetna $1,150,000 in January. Further financial settlements are likely to be pursued in NY and other states to resolve HIPAA violations and privacy and security-related breaches of state laws.

The post 2018 HIPAA Changes and Enforcement Outlook appeared first on HIPAA Journal.