BA Breach & Fines Examples

Medical Device Manufacturer UFP Technologies Confirms Data Stolen in Cyberattack

The U.S. medical device manufacturer UFP Technologies has submitted a FORM 8-K filing to the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to notify the SEC and investors about a cyberattack and data breach that could potentially impact its financial condition or operations.

UFP Technologies is a publicly traded contract manufacturer based in Newburyport, Massachusetts, that makes single-use medical devices and highly engineered components for the aerospace, automotive, healthcare, and defense industries. The company produces a wide range of medical devices and medical components for products used in wound care, implants, and orthopedic and surgical products. UFP Technologies has an annual revenue of $600 million and employs 4,300 people.

According to the filing, UFP Technologies detected an IT systems intrusion on February 14, 2026. Immediate action was taken to assess, contain, and remediate the threat, and third-party cybersecurity experts were engaged to assist with the investigation. UFP Technologies said it believes the cyber threat actor responsible for the attack has been eradicated from its IT environment and confirmed that it has restored access to systems and information impacted by the incident in all material respects. While the attack did not impact all of its IT systems, many were affected, including the systems used for billing and label-making. UFP Technologies implemented its incident response and contingency plans, and since the incident was detected, it was able to continue operations in all material respects.

Some company and company-related data was either stolen or destroyed in the attack, which suggests this was a ransomware attack or that wiper malware was used. No threat group appears to have claimed responsibility for the attack. UFP Technologies explained in the filing that data has been recovered from backups. The company has confirmed that some data was exfiltrated from its system, although it is too early to determine the extent of the data theft, such as whether any personal or protected health information was stolen. The investigation to determine the nature and scope of the incident is ongoing, and the company is exploring the legal and regulatory notifications and filings that may be required.

As of the date of the filing (February 19, 2026), UFP Technologies said the incident has not had any material impact on its financial systems, operations, or financial condition. While costs have naturally been incurred, the company expects a significant proportion of the costs of containment, investigation, and mitigation will be covered by its cyber insurance policy.

The post Medical Device Manufacturer UFP Technologies Confirms Data Stolen in Cyberattack appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

Vikor Scientific Affected by Ransomware Attack on Revenue Cycle Management Vendor

Vikor Scientific (now rebranded as Vanta Diagnostics), a molecular diagnostics company based in Charleston, South Carolina, has been affected by a security incident at one of its vendors – the revenue cycle management company, Catalyst RCM. The breach also affected the Vikor Scientific-owned molecular testing laboratory KorGene,  and KorPath, a Tampa, Florida-based anatomical pathology lab, which partners with Vanta Diagnostics. Vikor Scientific has reported the data breach to the HHS’ Office for Civil Rights as involving the electronic protected health information (ePHI) of 139,964 individuals.

Catalyst RCM has published a substitute breach notice on its website and is issuing notification letters to the affected individuals on behalf of its affected HIPAA-covered entity clients. While it is ultimately the responsibility of each affected HIPAA-covered entity to issue notification letters when there has been a data breach at a vendor, the notification responsibilities are often delegated to the vendor.

In the breach notice, Catalyst RCM explains that suspicious activity was identified within its secure file management system on or around November 13, 2025. An investigation was launched, which identified an unauthorized login to a system used to access one of its servers. The server was accessed without authorization between November 8, 2025, and November 9, 2025. The affected system was reviewed to determine whether any protected health information had been exposed or stolen, and the review concluded on December 12, 2025. Catalyst RCM confirmed that the threat actor exfiltrated data in the attack.

Data potentially compromised in the incident varies from individual to individual and may include names plus one or more of the following: date of birth, diagnosis information, medical treatment information, history, health insurance information, and/or payment card information with access code.

Catalyst RCM has updated its security policies, procedures, and protocols to reduce the likelihood of similar incidents in the future, and has advised the affected individuals to remain vigilant against identity theft and fraud by monitoring their free credit reports. While no misuse of the affected data has been identified, the affected individuals have been offered complimentary credit monitoring and identity theft protection services.

While the incident was not described as a ransomware attack, the Everest ransomware group claimed responsibility for the attack and added Vikor Scientific to its dark web data leak site, along with samples of data allegedly stolen in the attack. Everest threatened to leak the stolen data if contact was not made. Everest claims to have leaked all data exfiltrated in the attack, indicating the ransom was not paid.

The post Vikor Scientific Affected by Ransomware Attack on Revenue Cycle Management Vendor appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

Healthcare Technology Company Discloses Ransomware Attack

Cyberattacks and data breaches have recently been announced by the healthcare technology company Insightin Health and the Colorado-based medical billing and practice management company, Clinic Service Corporation.

Insightin Health, Maryland

Insightin Health, a Baltimore, MD-based healthcare technology company that offers an AI-driven digital health platform to health insurers and payers, has experienced a cyberattack involving unauthorized access to patient data. Suspicious network activity was identified in September 2025, and the forensic investigation confirmed unauthorized access to its network between September 17, 2025, and September 23, 2025.

The data review revealed the exposed files included protected health information associated with its clients, such as names, dates of birth, contract numbers, health insurance providers’ non-unique identifiers, Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers, and information associated with attributed providers. The substitute data breach notice includes steps that the affected individuals can take to protect themselves against misuse of their information. While not stated in the substitute breach notice, the affected individuals should be aware that the Medusa ransomware group claimed responsibility for the attack and threatened to publish the stolen data. The group claims to have exfiltrated 378 GB of data from the Insightin Health network.

Clinic Service Corporation, Colorado

Clinic Service Corporation, a medical billing and practice management company based in Denver, Colorado, has experienced a hacking incident that exposed sensitive data. The intrusion was identified on August 17, 2025, and the forensic investigation confirmed that its network was accessed by an unauthorized third party from August 10, 2025, to August 17, 2025.

The data review has confirmed that personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI) was compromised in the incident, including names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, diagnoses, treatment information, patient ID numbers, dates of service, medical record numbers, Medicare/Medicaid numbers, health insurance information, claims information, and treatment cost information. The affected individuals have been offered complimentary credit monitoring and identity theft protection services. Regulators have been notified, although the incident is not yet shown on the HHS’ Office for Civil Rights website, so it is currently unclear how many individuals have been affected.

The post Healthcare Technology Company Discloses Ransomware Attack appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

Gryphon Healthcare Agrees to Pay $2.87M to Settle Class Action Data Breach Lawsuit

Gryphon Healthcare, a Houston, TX-based revenue cycle, coding, compliance, consultancy, and management services vendor, faced multiple class action lawsuits over a July 2024 cyberattack involving a partner for which it provides billing services. Gryphon Healthcare learned about the incident in August 2024, and its investigation found that files may have been viewed or obtained. Those files contained the protected health information of 393,358 patients, including names, dates of birth, addresses, Social Security numbers, dates of service, diagnoses, medical treatment information, prescriptions, medical record numbers, and health insurance information.

On or around October 11, 2024, Gryphon Healthcare started sending notification letters to the affected individuals, and shortly thereafter, the first class action lawsuit was filed. A further eight lawsuits were subsequently filed, which were consolidated into a single complaint – Morris et al., v. Gryphon Healthcare, LLC – in the District Court for Harris County, Texas. The lawsuit asserted claims of negligence/negligence per se, breach of contract, breach of implied contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of confidence, invasion of privacy, unjust enrichment, bailment, a failure to provide adequate notice pursuant to any breach notification statute or common law duty, and violations of state consumer protection laws.

While Gryphon Healthcare denies wrongdoing, fault, and liability for the cyberattack and data breach, after considering the cost and distraction of continuing the litigation and the uncertainty of trial, the decision was taken to settle. Under the terms of the settlement, Gryphon Healthcare will establish a $2,800,000 settlement fund to cover attorneys’ fees and expenses, settlement administration costs, and service awards for the nine named plaintiffs. After those costs have been deducted, the remainder of the fund will be used to pay benefits to the class members.

Class members may choose one of two cash payments. They may submit a claim for reimbursement of documented, unreimbursed losses due to the data breach up to a maximum of $5,000 per class member. Alternatively, they may choose to receive a cash payment, which is estimated to be $100, but may increase or decrease depending on the number of valid claims received. All class members who submit a valid claim are entitled to a two-year membership to an identity theft protection and medical data monitoring service, which includes a $1 million identity theft insurance policy. The deadline for objecting to the settlement and opting out is March 17, 2026. Claims must be submitted by April 16, 2026, and the final fairness hearing has been scheduled for August 31, 2026.

Nov 4, 2024: Gryphon Healthcare Facing Multiple Lawsuits Over 400,000-Record Data Breach

Gryphon Healthcare, a Houston, TX-based provider of revenue cycle management and medical billing services to healthcare providers, is facing multiple class action lawsuits over an August 2024 data breach that involved unauthorized access to the protected health information of almost 400,000 individuals. The compromised information included names, contact information, Social Security numbers, diagnosis and treatment information, health insurance information, and medical record numbers. The intrusion occurred via an unnamed IT service provider.

At least seven lawsuits have now been filed by individuals who were recently notified about the exposure of their protected health information. The plaintiffs allege that Gryphon Healthcare failed to implement reasonable and appropriate cybersecurity measures to protect the sensitive information it stored and also failed to monitor its network for unauthorized activity. The lawsuits assert that if appropriate defenses had been implemented and if industry standards had been adhered to, the data breach could have been prevented. Proper monitoring would have allowed the intrusion to be detected much more promptly.

The lawsuits make similar claims, including a violation of duties under common law, contract law, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act. The plaintiffs allege that the theft of their personal and protected health information has resulted in them suffering and continuing to suffer injuries, including financial harm due to the misuse of their information, lost time due to the detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud, and the loss or diminished value of their private information.

The plaintiffs make claims of negligence, negligence per se, invasion of privacy, breach of confidence, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of implied contract, breach of third-party beneficiary contract, and unjust enrichment. The lawsuits were filed in Texas federal court and seek class action certification for a nationwide class of individuals affected by the data breach, a jury trial, actual, compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages, and injunctive relief, including an order from the court requiring Gryphon Healthcare to implement a host of security measures to safeguard the personal and protected health information stored by the company.

The post Gryphon Healthcare Agrees to Pay $2.87M to Settle Class Action Data Breach Lawsuit appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

Veradigm to Pay $10.5M to Settle Class Action Data Breach Lawsuit

The healthcare technology company Veradigm Inc. (formerly Allscripts) has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit that was filed in response to a 2024 data breach that compromised sensitive patient data. The Illinois-based company provides software tools to healthcare organizations, including electronic medical record software and practice management tools. In December 2024, cybercriminals accessed its network and potentially obtained patient data belonging to its healthcare clients. More than 2 million patients were affected. Data compromised in the incident included names, contact information, dates of birth, health record information, insurance claim data, payment information, and other identifiers, such as Social Security numbers and copies of their driver’s licenses.

The first class action lawsuit in response to the data breach was filed in June 2025 by plaintiffs Tony Goodrum and Jason Mixton, individually and on behalf of similarly situated individuals. A second class action lawsuit was subsequently filed, and the two actions were consolidated into a single action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, since they had overlapping claims.

The consolidated lawsuit – Goodrum, et al. v. Veradigm Inc.– alleged that the data breach was the result of negligence, and could have been prevented had reasonable and appropriate cybersecurity measures been implemented. In addition to negligence, the lawsuit asserted claims for negligence per se, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment, declaratory judgment, and injunctive relief.

Veradigm denies all claims of wrongdoing and liability; however, shortly after the two lawsuits were filed, the company explored the prospect of early resolution. Following mediation after the consolidated lawsuit was filed, an agreement in principle was reached to settle the litigation, with no admission of liability or wrongdoing. Class counsel and the class representatives believe the negotiated settlement is fair and in the best interests of the class members.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Veradigm has agreed to establish a $10,500,000 settlement fund to cover claims for benefits for the class members, settlement administration costs, and attorneys’ fees and costs, as approved by the court. Class members are entitled to submit a claim for up to $5,000 as reimbursement of documented, unreimbursed losses due to the data breach or, alternatively, may claim a cash payment, which is expected to be $50, but will be adjusted based on the number of valid claims received. Regardless of the option chosen, class members are also entitled to claim a two-year membership to a medical data monitoring product. Further information on what may be claimed can be found on the settlement website: https://veradigmdatasettlement.com/

The deadline for objection and opting out of the settlement is February 17, 2026. Claims must be submitted by March 3, 2026, and the final fairness hearing has been scheduled for March 18, 2026.

The post Veradigm to Pay $10.5M to Settle Class Action Data Breach Lawsuit appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

Tens of Thousands of Patients Affected by Two Business Associate Data Breaches

Mid Michigan Medical Billing Service, a Flint, MI-based revenue cycle management company that provides billing support services to HIPAA-covered entities, has fallen victim to a cyberattack that exposed the sensitive data of patients of its healthcare clients.

Suspicious network activity was identified on March 27, 2025, and the forensic investigation confirmed that an unauthorized third party accessed and copied data from its network. The affected data was reviewed to determine the types of information involved and the affected individuals. Mid Michigan Medical Billing Service then notified the affected covered entity clients and worked with them to provide notice to the affected individuals.

The file review confirmed that the protected health information of 28,185 individuals had been exposed in the cyberattack. The compromised data varied from individual to individual and may have included names in combination with one or more of the following: date of birth, driver’s license/ government issued identification number, Medicare/Medicaid identification number, diagnosis/treatment information, medical record number/patient account number, health insurance information, payment card number, employer identification number, passport number, treating/referring provider name, and biometric data. For a limited number of individuals, Social Security numbers were involved.

VillageCareMAX, New York

VillageCareMAX, a New York, NY-based provider of health plans and community healthcare services to seniors and individuals with chronic diseases, has announced a data breach involving one of its business associates, TMG Health.

VillageCareMAX uses the Cognizant-owned TMG Health to assist with the administration of its members’ health plans. TMG Health identified unauthorized activity within its information system on September 19, 2025. The unauthorized access was immediately terminated, and an investigation was launched to determine the nature and scope of the unauthorized activity. TMG Health determined that an unauthorized third party had access to its network for 10 months from November 20, 2024, to September 19, 2025. During that time, VillageCareMAX members’ protected health information may have been accessed and acquired.

The affected data included names, member identification numbers, health information, and Social Security numbers. While no misuse of that data has been identified, the affected individuals have been offered complimentary credit monitoring and identity theft recovery services. VillageCareMAX has received assurances that TMG Health has implemented technological and procedural enhancements to prevent similar incidents in the future.

VillageCareMAX provides services to more than 35,000 individuals each year. It is currently unclear how many of those individuals have been affected.

The post Tens of Thousands of Patients Affected by Two Business Associate Data Breaches appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

Patient Data Compromised in Cyberattacks on Sleep Specialists

Two sleep specialists, Persante Health Care in New Jersey and SomnoSleep Consultants in Virginia, have recently disclosed security incidents that exposed patient information.

Persante Health Care Patients Informed About January 2025 Cyberattack

Persante Health Care, a Mount Laurel Township, NJ-based national provider of sleep and balance center management services to hospitals and physician practices, has announced a security incident that was detected on or around January 28, 2025.

Unusual activity was identified within its computer network and, assisted by third-party cybersecurity experts, it was determined that an unauthorized third party accessed its network between January 23 and January 28, 2025. During that time, files containing patient information may have been accessed or acquired. It took more than 8 months to review the affected files to determine whether patient data had been exposed. On October 3, 2025, the data review confirmed that personal and protected health information was involved.

The exposed data varied from individual to individual and may have included names in combination with one or more of the following: date of birth, Social Security number, driver’s license number, state identification number, passport number, government identification number, taxpayer identification number, date(s) of service, physician or facility name, patient account number, medical record number, financial account information, payment card number, medical device identifier(s), and/or biometric identifier(s).

The Federal Bureau of Investigation was informed about the cyberattack, and Persante Health Care is assisting with the investigation. Additional measures have been implemented to reduce the risk of similar incidents in the future, and the affected individuals were notified by mail on November 26, 2025. The number of affected individuals has yet to be publicly disclosed.

SomnoSleep Consultants’ Patients Affected by Business Associate Data Breach

Patients of Annadale, VA-based SomnoSleep Consultants have been notified about a security incident at a third-party billing vendor, Avosina Healthcare Solutions. The vendor detected unauthorized access to its network on July 29, 2025, in what appears to have been a ransomware attack. Avosina said it was able to restore its services from backups; therefore, no ransom was paid. The FBI was notified, and third-party cybersecurity experts were engaged to determine the nature and scope of the incident and implement additional security measures to protect against further attacks.

The investigation confirmed that some documents were exfiltrated from its network. The analysis of those files confirmed that they contained patients’ names, addresses, medical information, and health insurance information. SomnoSleep said there was no unauthorized access to any files part of its electronic medical record system.

Avosina notified SomnoSleep about the attack on September 29, 2025, and on November 17, 2025, SomnoSleep provided additional information on the affected patients and delegated the responsibility for sending notification letters to its business associate. SomnoSleep said that no evidence has been found to indicate that any of the impacted patient data has been misused.

Avosina confirmed to SomnoSleep that steps have been taken to correct the vulnerability that was exploited by the threat actor, and other security measures have been implemented to protect against any further unauthorized network access. Internal data management protocols have also been reviewed.

The post Patient Data Compromised in Cyberattacks on Sleep Specialists appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

Geisinger Health & Nuance Communications Data Breach Litigation Settled for $5 Million

The Danville, Pennsylvania-based healthcare provider Geisinger Health and its former IT vendor Nuance Communications, Inc., have agreed to a $5 million settlement to resolve class action litigation over a 2023 insider data breach involving a former Nuance Communications employee.

On or around November 29, 2023, Geisinger Health learned that a former Nuance Communications employee, Andre J. Burk (also known as Max Vance), accessed the sensitive data of Geisinger Health patients two days after he was terminated by Nuance Communications. The data had been provided to Nuance Communications in connection with the services the IT company was contracted to provide. The breach was detected by Geisinger Health, rather than Nuance Communications, and it alerted its IT vendor about the breach.

Under HIPAA, business associates of HIPAA-regulated entities must comply with the HIPAA Security Rule, one of the requirements of which is to ensure that access rights are immediately revoked when employees are terminated. When notified about the unauthorized access, Nuance Communications terminated the former employee’s access rights and launched an investigation, which revealed that the former employee had potentially obtained the protected health information of more than 1.2 million Geisinger Health patients, including names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, medical information, and health insurance information.

The affected individuals started to be notified about the data breach on June 24, 2024. The delay in notification was at the request of law enforcement. The HHS’ Office for Civil Rights was informed that the protected health information of 1,276,026 individuals was involved. Max Vance is now facing criminal charges over the data theft – one count of obtaining information from a protected computer – and his trial is scheduled for early January 2026.

Several lawsuits were filed against Geisinger Health and Nuance Communications, Inc. in response to the data breach, which were consolidated into a single action in July 2024 – In re: Geisinger Health Data Security Incident Litigation – in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The consolidated lawsuit alleged that the defendants failed to implement and maintain reasonable and adequate security measures to secure, protect, and safeguard the plaintiffs’ and class members’ personal and protected health information.

The lawsuit alleged that Geisinger Health failed to ensure that its vendors employed reasonable security measures, that Nuance Communications failed to properly monitor systems for intrusions, there was insufficient network segmentation, and a failure to comply with FTC guidelines, the HIPAA Rules, and the defendants did not adhere to industry standard cybersecurity measures. The lawsuit asserted claims of negligence, negligence per se, breach of implied contract, breach of third-party beneficiary contract, unjust enrichment, and declaratory judgment and injunctive relief against both defendants, and breach of fiduciary duty against defendant Geisinger Health.

The defendants disagree with the claims in the lawsuit; however, they chose to settle with no admission of wrongdoing to avoid the expense and uncertainty of a trial and related appeals. The settlement received preliminary approval from District Court Judge Matthew W. Brann on November 18, 2025. Under the terms of the settlement, the defendants will establish a $5,000,000 settlement fund, from which attorneys’ fees and expenses, service awards, and settlement administration costs will be deducted. The remainder of the funds will be used to pay benefits to the class members.

The class consists of 1,308,363 class members who may choose to receive a one-year membership to a credit monitoring and identity theft protection service. In addition, a claim may be submitted for reimbursement of documented, unreimbursed out-of-pocket losses due to the data breach up to $5,000 per class member. Alternatively, instead of a claim for reimbursement of losses, class members may choose to receive a pro rata cash payment. The final approval hearing has been scheduled for March 16, 2026, and claims must be submitted by March 18, 2026.

June 24, 2024: Geisinger: Former Business Associate Employee Unlawfully Accessed PHI of More Than 1.2 Million Patients

More than one million Geisinger patients are being notified that their protected health information has been unlawfully accessed by a former employee of one of its business associates, Nuance Communications.

Nuance Communications provides information technology services to Geisinger, which requires access to systems containing patient information. On November 29, 2023, Geisinger detected unauthorized access to patient data by a former Nuance employee and immediately notified Nuance about the incident. Nuance immediately terminated the former employee’s access and launched an investigation, which confirmed that the former employee accessed patient data two days after they were terminated.

The former employee may have viewed and acquired the data of more than one million Geisinger patients. The data varied from patient to patient and may have included names, addresses, phone numbers, dates of birth, admission/discharge/transfer codes, medical record numbers, facility name abbreviations, and race and gender information. Nuance has confirmed that the employee did not have access to Social Security numbers, financial information, or claims/insurance information.

The Department of Justice can pursue criminal charges for HIPAA violations under the Social Security Act when individuals knowingly violate HIPAA. When an employee of a HIPAA-covered entity or business associate has their employment terminated, HIPAA still applies. The penalties for accessing and obtaining protected health information are severe and can include a hefty fine and jail time. A tier 1 violation carries a maximum penalty of up to a year in jail, a tier 2 violation carries a jail term of up to 5 years, and a sentence of up to 10 years in jail is possible for a tier 3 violation – obtaining PHI for personal gain or with malicious intent. Geisinger has confirmed that the unauthorized access was reported to law enforcement and the former Nuance employee has been arrested and is facing federal criminal charges.

Due to the high risk of unauthorized access to patient data by former employees, HIPAA-covered entities and their business associates are required to develop and implement procedures for terminating access to electronic protected health information when employment comes to an end under the workforce security standard of the HIPAA Security Rule – 45 CFR § 164.308 (3)(ii)(C). This incident clearly shows why it is vital to revoke access immediately upon termination of employment. The HHS’ Office for Civil Rights has taken action over violations of this Security Rule provision in 2020 (City of New Haven) and 2018 (Pagosa Springs Medical Center).

The Risant Health-owned health system has confirmed that Nuance Communications is mailing notifications to the affected individuals. Patients have been advised to review the statements they receive from their health plans and contact their health insurer if any services appear on their statements that they have not received. A helpline has been set up for individuals requiring further information about the breach – 855-575-8722. The helpline is manned from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. ET Monday to Friday. Callers should quote engagement number B124651.

The breach was reported to the HHS’ Office for Civil Rights as affecting 1,276,026 individuals.

This article has been updated to state the number of people affected by the breach, as that information was unavailable at the time of the initial post.

The post Geisinger Health & Nuance Communications Data Breach Litigation Settled for $5 Million appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

EHR Vendor Identifies Business Associate Data Breach

Data breaches have recently been announced by the EHR vendor CareTracker (Amazing Charts) and the Wisconsin health system, Marshfield Clinic.

CareTracker (Amazing Charts)

CareTracker Inc., doing business as Amazing Charts, an electronic health record and practice management platform provider, has been affected by a security incident at one of its vendors. On June 19, 2025, Amazing Charts identified unusual activity within a system managed by a third-party vendor. Immediate action was taken to secure the vendor’s environment, and an investigation was launched to determine the nature and scope of the activity.

The investigation confirmed unauthorized access to the service provider’s network between June 15, 2025, and June 19, 2025. Files were then reviewed to determine the individuals affected and the types of data involved. Due to the complexity of the data review, that process has only recently been completed.

Data potentially compromised in the incident included names in combination with one or more of the following: diagnoses, treatment information, physician names, medical record numbers, and health insurance information. Notification letters have recently been mailed to the affected individuals, and complimentary credit monitoring services have been offered for 12 months. At the time of notification, no misuse of the affected information had been identified.

Marshfield Clinic Health System

Marshfield Clinic Health System, an integrated health system serving Wisconsin and Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, identified unauthorized access to certain employee email accounts on or around August 27, 2025. The forensic investigation confirmed that an unauthorized third party had access to the accounts from August 26 to August 27, 2025, and potentially accessed or copied emails containing patient information. The types of information compromised in the incident varied from individual to individual and may have included names, medical record numbers, health insurance information, diagnosis, and treatment information.

The affected individuals are being notified by mail and have been offered complimentary credit monitoring and identity theft protection services. The incident is not yet shown on the HHS’ Office for Civil Rights website, so it is currently unclear how many individuals have been affected.

The post EHR Vendor Identifies Business Associate Data Breach appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.