HIPAA Breach News

Ransomware Attack on Salina Family Healthcare Impacts 77,000 Patients

In June, ransomware was installed on servers and workstations at Salina Family Healthcare in Kansas resulting in the encryption and potential disclosure of patients protected health information.

The attack occurred on June 18, 2017. Salina Family Healthcare was able to limit the extent of the attack by taking swift action to secure its systems. It was also possible to restore the encrypted data from recent backups so no ransom needed to be paid.

A third-party computer forensics firm was contracted to analyze its systems to determine how the ransomware was installed and whether the attackers succeeded in gaining access to or stealing patient data. While evidence of data theft was not uncovered, the firm was unable to rule out the possibility that the actors behind the attack viewed or copied patient data.

The protected health information potentially accessed includes names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, medical treatment information, and health insurance details.

While data access was possible, no reports have been received to suggest any information has been stolen and misused, although patients should be alert to the possibility of data theft and should monitor their accounts and Explanation of Benefits statements closely for any sign of fraudulent activity.

Patients potentially impacted by the attack have now been notified of the security breach and have been offered credit monitoring and identity theft restoration services for 12 months without charge out of an abundance of caution.

Salina Family Healthcare has already taken a number of steps to improve security following the ransomware attack. Those measures include upgrading network servers, regularly scanning the network for viruses, providing the workforce with additional security training on malware threats, and limiting Internet access for staff to reduce exposure.

The breach report submitted to the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights indicates 77,337 patients and payment guarantors have potentially been impacted by the security incident.

The post Ransomware Attack on Salina Family Healthcare Impacts 77,000 Patients appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Third-Party Mailing Error Sees Aetna Plan Members’ HIV Status Disclosed

Aetna is in the news again for the wrong reasons, having experienced another protected health information breach. The latest incident impacts approximately 12,000 Aetna plan members and resulted in highly sensitive information being disclosed to unauthorized individuals.

An error was made in a recent mailing to plan members. That error resulted in the HIV positive of members being disclosed to other individuals. The letters advised plan members about their options for filling in their HIV prescriptions. However, some of that information was visible through the transparent plastic window in the envelope along with names and addresses. The mailing was sent by a third-party vendor on July 28, 2017.

Aetna was notified of the error by the Legal Action Center and the AIDS Law Project of Pennsylvania, which in turn were notified of the error by some individuals whose HIV status had been disclosed. Those individuals said that in addition to the information being visible to the mailman, the letters had been viewed by roommates, neighbors and family members.

The potential harm caused by an error such as this is considerable. As Ronda Goldfein, executive director of AIDS Law Project of Pennsylvania explained, “It creates a tangible risk of violence, discrimination and other trauma.”

All patients affected by the privacy breach have now been informed of the error by mail. Aetna explained that for some patients, the letter had slipped inside the envelope making the sensitive information visible. Aetna explained to patients that the “mistake is unacceptable” and that a review is now being conducted to ensure similar incidents do not occur in the future.

This breach comes just two months after Aetna announced the discovery of an error that resulted in the protected health information of approximately 5,000 individuals being indexed by search engines and made available to unauthorized individuals over the Internet.

The post Third-Party Mailing Error Sees Aetna Plan Members’ HIV Status Disclosed appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Credit Monitoring Services Must Now Be Offered to Breach Victims in Delaware

For the first time in the past 10 years, Delaware has amended its data breach notification law and has now introduced some of the strictest requirements of any state. Any ‘person’ operating in the state of Delaware must now notify individuals of the exposure or theft of their sensitive information and must offer breach victims complimentary credit monitoring services for 12 months. Connecticut was the first state to introduce similar laws, with California also requiring the provision of credit monitoring services to breach victims.

Breach victims must also be advised of security incidents involving their sensitive information ‘as soon as possible’ and no later than 60 days following the discovery of a breach. The new law also requires companies operating in the state to implement “reasonable” security measures to safeguard personal information – Delaware is the 14th state to require companies to adopt security measures to ensure sensitive information is protected.

The definition of ‘personal information’ has also been expanded and now includes usernames/email addresses in combination with a password/answers to security questions, password numbers, driver’s license numbers, mental health and physical condition, medical histories, health insurance policy numbers, subscriber identification numbers, medical treatment information, medical diagnoses, DNA profiles, unique biometric data (including fingerprints/retina scans), and tax payer identification numbers.

Companies can avoid sending notifications and providing credit monitoring services if data is encrypted prior to a cyberattack or other security incident, unless it is reasonably believed the breach also resulted in the encryption key being compromised.

Rep. Paul Baumbach, D-Newark, who sponsored the bill, said the new legislation is ” A meaningful step forward in addressing these breaches so that we guarantee better protections for our residents and help them rebuild their lives after a cyberattack.”

House Bill 180 was passed earlier this month. The new law has an effective date of April 14, 2018.

The post Credit Monitoring Services Must Now Be Offered to Breach Victims in Delaware appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

MJHS Phishing Attack Result in the Exposure of 28,000 Individuals’ PHI

There has been a spate of phishing attacks on healthcare organizations in the past few weeks. The increased threat of attacks prompted the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights to issue a warning to healthcare organizations, urging them to improve their defenses by conducting regular security awareness training sessions for employees.

Phishing is the number one attack vector for delivering malware and successful attacks can result in the theft of considerable amounts of sensitive data. Email accounts contain a wide range of sensitive data on patients – information that can be used to commit identity theft and medical fraud, although oftentimes attacks are conducted to gain access to emails accounts for the purposes of spamming.

In the case of the phishing attack on MJHS, the motive of the malicious actor is unknown. Fortunately, rapid identification and mitigation of the attack limited the attacker’s window of opportunity. The compromised email accounts were secured before the accounts could be used to send any emails, although it is possible that the protected health information of patients/plan members may have been viewed.

On June 6, 2017, MJHS learned that an unauthorized individual gained access to the email accounts of several employees of Elderplan Inc., and on June 14, 2017 it was discovered that access was also gained to an email account of a MJHS Home Care employee.

MJHS called in a leading third-party forensic firm to assist with the investigation and determine whether any emails had been accessed or forwarded. The firm was unable to detect any suspicious activity during the short time that access to the Elderplan and MJHS Home Care email accounts was possible.

Inspection of the emails in the compromised accounts showed they contained individuals’ names, diagnoses, Medicare numbers, insurance information, treatment dates and the facilities where treatment was provided. MJHS has notified all individuals impacted by the phishing attack and has offered complimentary credit monitoring services for 12 months through Kroll.

MJHS explained to patients that no evidence was uncovered to suggest any ePHI was viewed, stolen or misused by the attacker, although as a precaution, affected individuals have been advised to monitor their Explanation of Benefits statements closely for any sign of fraudulent activity.

The phishing attack has now been reported to Office for Civil Rights. The breach reports show 22,000 Elderplan members have been affected along with 6,000 patients of MJHS Home Care.

The post MJHS Phishing Attack Result in the Exposure of 28,000 Individuals’ PHI appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

34,000 Impacted by Ransomware Attack at St. Mark’s Surgical Center

Another healthcare organization has been attacked with ransomware, resulting in the protected health information of almost 34,000 patients being encrypted and made inaccessible.

St. Mark’s Surgical Center in Fort Myers, FL experienced the ransomware attack on April 13, 2017, which prevented patient data from being accessed until April 17, 2017. The ransomware was installed on the center’s server which contained patient’s names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers and treatment information.

An investigation into the breach was immediately conducted to determine the extent of the attack and to find out which data had been encrypted and the number of patients impacted. That investigation revealed the protected health information of 33,877 patients was potentially accessed by the attackers.

A third-party cybersecurity firm was called in to assist with the removal of the ransomware and to conduct a thorough forensic investigation. The firm was able to confirm that all traces of the malware were removed and further access to the server was blocked.

The firm also investigated whether the attack involved the accessing or theft of patient data. The investigation did not uncover any evidence to suggest any health information was stolen or viewed by the attackers, although the possibility could not be ruled out with a high degree of certainty.

As the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights has explained in its guidance on ransomware and subsequent blog posts, any ransomware attack that involves the encryption of ePHI is usually reportable. St. Mark’s Surgical Center followed that guidance and reported the security incident and notified all patients affected by the security breach to allow them to take action to minimize the possibility of misuse of their data.

All patients affected by the incident have also been offered complimentary credit monitoring and related services as an additional precaution against identity theft and fraud.

Prior to the attack, St. Mark’s Surgical Center had taken steps to reduce the risk of malware and ransomware incidents, although the attackers managed to bypass those defenses. To reduce the risk of future attacks, St. Mark’s Surgical Center has taken a number of steps to improve security, including purchasing a more robust firewall, improving patch management policies and ensuring all systems are protected by the latest antivirus software. Unified threat management services are also being used and a new backup and disaster recovery system has been implemented, which performs hourly backups and stores copies of those backups offsite in redundant data centers.

The substitute breach notice indicates the medical center learned of the extent of the attack on May 8, 2017, although the breach report on the Office for Civil Rights website shows the notice was submitted on August 9.

The maximum allowable time for notifying OCR and patients of a breach of ePHI is 60 days from the discovery of the breach, although covered entities should not delay the issuing of breach notifications unnecessarily.

Deven McGraw recently explained that breach notification delays are violations of HIPAA Rules, even when breach notices are issued within 60 days. If HIPAA covered entities delay the issuing of breach notices they risk a financial penalty for the violation, as Presense Health discovered. A one-month delay in issuing breach notifications resulted in a settlement of $475,000.

The post 34,000 Impacted by Ransomware Attack at St. Mark’s Surgical Center appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Institute for Women’s Health Hacked: PHI Compromised

Ransomware attacks on healthcare organizations have increased, although that is far from the only malware threat. Keylogging malware can be used to obtain sensitive information such as login credentials, or in the case of the San Antonio Institute for Women’s Health (IFWH), credit and debit card information as it was entered into its system.

The keylogging malware was discovered on the IFWH network on July 6, 2017, prompting a forensic investigation of its systems. That investigation revealed the malware had been installed on June 5, although it took until July 11 for the malware to be removed from the majority of its systems and a further two days for IFWH to confirm that the malware had been completely removed from all terminal servers and workstations.

During the time that the malware was present, it recorded and transmitted sensitive data as information was entered into its system. The types of data recorded by the malware between June 5 and July 11 includes names, dates of birth, addresses, Social Security numbers, scheduling notes, current procedural technology and other billing codes and other information that was entered into its system between those dates.

Any patient that paid for medical services using a credit or debit card between the above dates may have had their card data captured by the malware. IFWH said the incident was limited to information entered internally via keyboards. Data entered into its patient portal was not obtained by the hackers.

The Department of Health and Human Services has been informed of the breach and the incident has been reported to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. All patients impacted by the incident have now been notified of the breach by mail and have been offered identity theft protection services via ID Experts MyIDCare program. Patients will also benefit from 12 months of credit monitoring services and protection with a $1,000,000 insurance reimbursement policy.

Since credit card details were obtained, patients have been requested to contact their credit card companies and work with them to resolve any fraud issues and secure their accounts.

IFWH issued a statement confirming layered security defenses had been implemented prior to the malware attack, but those controls failed to prevent the virus from being installed. Those measures included network filtering and security monitoring solutions, firewalls, antivirus solutions and password protection. The malware attack has prompted IFWH to bolster its defenses to prevent further breaches, including enhancing data security on its web server infrastructure.

The post Institute for Women’s Health Hacked: PHI Compromised appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Healthcare Hacking Incidents Overtook Insider Breaches in July

Throughout 2017, the leading cause of healthcare data breaches has been insiders; however, in July hacking incidents dominated the breach reports.

Almost half of the breaches (17 incidents) reported in July for which the cause of the breach is known were attributed to hacking, which includes ransomware and malware attacks. Ransomware was involved in 10 of the 17 incidents.

The Protenus Breach Barometer report for July shows there were 36 reported breaches – The third lowest monthly total in 2017 and a major reduction from the previous month when 52 data breaches were reported – the worst month of the year to date by some distance.

In July, 575,142 individuals are known to have been impacted by healthcare data breaches, although figures have only been released for 29 of the incidents. The worst breach reported in July – a ransomware attack on
Women’s Health Care Group of PA – impacted 300,000 individuals.

While hacking incidents are usually lower than insider breaches, they typically result in the theft or exposure of the most healthcare records. July was no exception. Protenus reports that 21 times more records were exposed/stolen as a result of hacking incidents than breaches involving insiders. Hacking incidents impacted 516,053 of the 575,142 known victims in July.

There were 8 confirmed insider breaches (22.2% of the total) which resulted in the theft/exposure of 24,212 records. Three were attributed to errors by insiders with five caused by insider wrongdoing. 8.3% of the breaches were due to loss or theft, with three incidents involving the theft of physical records.

At the end of July, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights’ cybersecurity newsletter highlighted the risk from phishing attacks, reminding HIPAA-covered entities of the need to conduct security awareness training. July was a particularly bad month for phishing, with 5 phishing incidents reported.

The majority of breaches were experienced by healthcare providers (80.5%) followed by health plans (8.3%) and business associates (5.5%). More business associates may have been involved in the breaches according to Protenus, although insufficient data was available to confirm this. 5.5% of the breaches were attributed to other entities, including one fire dispatch center.

Over the past few months, the time taken by covered entities to report data breaches has improved, with June seeing virtually all breaches reported inside the 60-day window stipulated by the HIPAA Breach Notification Rule. However, there was a slight deterioration in July. The average time to report the breaches was 67.5 days, although the median was 60 days.

It should be noted that unnecessarily delaying breach reports is a violation of HIPAA Rules. Healthcare organizations should not wait until the 60-day deadline arrives before sending notification letters to patients/plan members and informing OCR.

The time taken to discover data breaches is poor in the healthcare industry. In July, the average time to discover a breach was 503 days (median was 79.5 days). The average time was skewed by a single breach that took an astonishing 14 years to discover – a breach involving an insider who had been snooping on patient records.

California, Georgia, and Indiana topped the list for the states worst affected by healthcare data breaches with three incidents apiece.

The post Healthcare Hacking Incidents Overtook Insider Breaches in July appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Lake Health Informs OB Patients of TriPoint Medical Center Breach

A log book containing the protected health information of approximately 750 obstetrics patients of TriPoint Medical Center in Concord Township, Ohio has been discovered to be missing.

All obstetrics departments are required by the Ohio Department of Health to maintain a log book detailing deliveries. The log book contained only limited protected health information of patients and the loss/theft of the logbook did not result in the exposure of any highly sensitive information such as Social Security numbers, financial information, or details of health insurance.

However, out of an abundance of caution, all individuals affected by the incident have been notified of the breach by mail and have been offered membership to an identity theft protection program for 12 months without charge.

Lake Health, which operates the medical center, was informed of the lost logbook in June and launched an investigation and conducted a risk assessment the same day. While the logbook has not been located, Lake Health has confirmed that none of the information in the log book has been lost. All information is transferred from the log book to its computer system and the digital copies are stored securely.

The Ohio Department of Health does not stipulate that log books be maintained in physical form. To improve security, Lake Health has updated its policies and procedures and the log book is now maintained in secure, digital form. Additionally, the incident has prompted Lake Health to provide further training for all obstetrics department employees on privacy and security.

Marketing and Business Development Senior Vice President Richard D. Cicero issued a statement saying Lake Health “deeply regrets this incident” and is committed to protecting the privacy and security of patients’ sensitive information. He explained, “We have rigorous processes and procedures in place to detect breaches of patients’ rights and to protect patients in the event of a breach.”

The post Lake Health Informs OB Patients of TriPoint Medical Center Breach appeared first on HIPAA Journal.

Ransomware Attack Suffered by Cove Family and Sports Medicine

A ransomware attack on Cove Family and Sports Medicine and Krichev Family Medicine, P.C., in Huntsville, Alabama resulted in the medical records and personal information of 4,300 patients being encrypted.

Ransomware was installed on April 14, 2017. Cove Medicine had backed up its data and was able to reinstall its operating system and recover encrypted files from backups, without having to resort to paying the ransom.

However, while the majority of PHI could be recovered, the backup devices were connected to its system at the time of the attack and some data were encrypted. Consequently, some information could not be recovered. Lost data was restricted to internal notes taken during visits dating back two years. Cove Medicine believes all other data have been recovered and the ability to provide medical services to patients has not been affected.

Some ransomware attacks have involved data theft although, in this case, no evidence of data theft has been uncovered and there was no indication systems were accessed prior to the deployment of ransomware. The purpose of the attack is believed to have solely been an attempt to extort money from the practice.

Notifications have been sent to patients to alert them to the ransomware attack out of an abundance of caution, even though ePHI access is not suspected. The types of information encrypted in the attack included names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, patient ID numbers, diagnoses, procedure information, times and dates of treatment, and prescription information.

As with all breaches involving more than 500 records, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights conducts an investigation. Provided organizations have implemented controls to reduce the risk of malware and ransomware attacks to the standard required by HIPAA, no further action is likely to be taken.

In this case, OCR was satisfied that Cove Family and Sports Medicine had implemented all appropriate controls and HIPAA Rules had not been violated. The investigation was closed with no further action required.

This ransomware attack clearly demonstrates how important it is for healthcare organizations to ensure back up devices are disconnected after backups have been performed. If backup devices are not air-gapped, backup files can be encrypted along with all other files on the infected computer and network.

If backups are encrypted, healthcare organizations will have little alternative but to pay the ransom. As the NotPetya (ExPetr) wiper attacks clearly showed, it may not be possible to recover data even if a ransom is paid.

The post Ransomware Attack Suffered by Cove Family and Sports Medicine appeared first on HIPAA Journal.