There’s good and bad news on the ransomware front. Attacks are down year-over-year; however, successful attacks are proving even costlier to mitigate, according to the Mid-Year Risk Report from the cyber risk management company Resilience. The company saw a 53% reduction in cyber insurance claims in the first half of the year, which indicates organizations are getting better at preventing attacks; however, when ransomware attacks succeed, they have been causing increased financial harm, with losses 17% year-over-year. While ransomware accounted for just 9.6% of claims in H1, 2025, ransomware attacks accounted for 91% of incurred losses.

On average, a successful ransomware attack causes $1.18 million in damages, up from $1.01 million in 2024, and the cost is even higher in healthcare. Resilience’s healthcare clients suffered average losses of $1.3 million in 2024, and in the first half of 2025, some healthcare providers faced extortion demands as high as $4 million. While it is too early to tell what the severity of claims will be in 2025 until claims are settled, Resilience said there are indications that the average severity of incurred losses for healthcare ransomware attacks this year could be $2 million, up from an average of $705,000 in 2024 and $1.6 million in 2023.

One of the most active ransomware groups this year has been Interlock, which has attacked many healthcare organizations. In a concerning development, Interlock has been observed stealing cyber insurance policies and using them to benchmark and set higher ransom demands. In at least two ransomware attacks, the threat actor referenced the victim’s cyber insurance policy in the ransom demands, and in at least one case, set the ransom demand to just below the policy payout limit.

Resilience warns that cyberattacks are increasing in sophistication and that AI is increasingly being leveraged for social engineering and phishing campaigns. Social engineering and phishing attacks were linked to 88% of incurred losses in H1, 2025. AI-assisted phishing campaigns are more difficult for users to identify and for organizations to block. The success rate of traditional phishing and social engineering attempts is 12%, compared to 54% for AI-assisted attacks. Resilience reports that 1.8 billion credentials were compromised in H1, 2025 alone, an increase of 800% since January 2025. Social engineering and phishing stood out as leading causes of attacks, along with the inadvertent disclosure of sensitive data due to errors made using tracking technologies.

HIPAA Security Rule Compliance May Not Sufficiently Reduce Risk

Resilience cited one example of a healthcare provider that had invested significantly in cybersecurity yet still fell victim to an attack. The investigation revealed that while reasonable decisions had been made concerning cybersecurity, there were naturally trade-offs due to budgetary constraints. Those tradeoffs meant vulnerabilities were created that were ultimately exploited. Despite investing in cybersecurity, the organization’s risk assessments had not been updated in around four years, which is an aspect of compliance that the HHS’ Office for Civil Rights is actively enforcing due to its importance on security posture.

While the organization initially tested its endpoint protection to ensure it was effective, there was no routine testing after implementation to ensure those measures continued to provide adequate protection. Vendor risk management largely consisted of checks of security policy documents, rather than active monitoring, which only occurred for a few vendors. Incident response plans and disaster recovery exercises failed to consistently meet the organization’s recovery objectives, but the issue was not addressed due to limited resources and competing priorities. Gaps were identified in its backup procedures, as the threat actor was able to encrypt clinical images that had been missed from backups. That gave the threat actor significant leverage in ransom negotiations. The organization found that its assumed security posture bore little resemblance to its actual defensive capabilities.

Cybersecurity Recommendations for Healthcare Organizations

Naturally, there will be cybersecurity tradeoffs with budgetary restrictions, but the security gaps identified in that case study are all too common in healthcare. Resilience suggests that these security gaps are often a consequence of a focus on HIPAA compliance. The problem is that HIPAA only sets baseline standards for security, and the HIPAA Security Rule is more than 2 decades old.  A focus on compliance may help avoid regulatory penalties, but may not effectively reduce risks or adequately protect against modern threats.

“Organizations deploying disconnected security tools without strategic coordination create gaps between systems, while annual assessments become check-box exercises using outdated measures of effectiveness,” suggests Resilience. “Effective healthcare cybersecurity requires quantifying cyber risks in financial terms rather than relying on subjective ratings. Loss exceedance curves model potential impacts based on organization-specific factors, enabling leaders to understand exactly what risks could cost in business disruption, recovery expenses, and regulatory fines. When expressed financially, security discussions shift from technical justifications to strategic investment decisions.”

Based on its analysis of the current threat landscape, Resilience recommends healthcare organizations prioritize the following areas to improve their cybersecurity posture and limit the harm of a successful attack

• Implement a comprehensive backup strategy with particular attention to imaging files, databases, and system configurations
• Ensure regular tests are conducted to validate recovery capabilities and timeframes under realistic attack scenarios
• Treat your cyber insurance policy as part of your crown jewels, and ensure it is properly secured
• Implement robust training programs that address phishing, social engineering, and proper data handling procedures
• Ensure there is continuous monitoring of third-party vendors’ security postures
• Adopt methodologies that translate cyber risks into financial terms to allow leadership to make informed investment decisions based on actual risk reduction potential rather than compliance
• Implement and regularly test your incident response plan, including patient safety considerations and regulatory notification requirements

The post Cyber Insurance Claims Fall But Ransomware Losses Increase appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

Microsoft has announced the seizure of hundreds of websites used by a popular phishing-as-a-service (PhaaS) operation that targets Microsoft 365 credentials. The operation’s phishing kits have been used to steal at least 5,000 usernames and passwords, including the Microsoft 365 credentials of at least 20 U.S. healthcare organizations.

According to the Microsoft Digital Crimes Unit (DCU), RaccoonO365 is the fastest-growing tool used by cybercriminals to steal Microsoft 365 usernames and passwords. The PhaaS operation provides subscription-based phishing kits, which generate phishing emails mimicking official communications from Microsoft. The emails direct victims to websites that trick victims into disclosing their Microsoft 365 credentials. The phishing kits lower the barrier to conducting phishing campaigns and can be used by even low-skilled individuals to steal credentials.

RaccoonO365 has been offering phishing kits to cybercriminals since at least July 2024. Subscribers are able to use the infrastructure to send up to 9,000 phishing emails per day. A 30-day subscription costs less than $12 per day, and under $10 per day for a 60-day subscription. The phishing kits utilize sophisticated techniques to steal credentials and bypass multi-factor authentication. Recently, RaccoonO365 added a new service that utilizes AI to scale operations and increase the sophistication and effectiveness of phishing campaigns.

The stolen credentials can provide access to accounts and sensitive data; however, they are commonly used to gain a foothold to launch more comprehensive attacks on victims, often leading to malware and ransomware downloads. The attacks have resulted in significant financial losses for healthcare providers and have disrupted critical patient care, putting patients at risk of harm. In addition to the attacks on healthcare organizations, RaccoonO365’s phishing kits were used for an extensive tax-themed phishing campaign that targeted more than 2,300 U.S. organizations worldwide.

MCU identified the leader of the operation, Joshua Ogundipe, who resides in Benin City in Nigeria. Ogundipe has a background in computer programming and is believed to have authored the bulk of the code for the phishing kits. Ogundipe was identified following a security lapse, which allowed MCU to identify a secret cryptocurrency wallet used by Ogundipe. Ogundipe, along with his associates, marketed and sold the RaccoonO365 phishing kits on Telegram and collected more than $100,000 in subscription payments. MCU estimates that between 100 and 200 subscriptions were sold, although that range is likely to be underestimated. Based on that range, subscribers could send between 900,000 and 1.8 million phishing emails per day. MCU’s intelligence has been shared with international law enforcement

Microsoft and Health-ISAC filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Ogundipe and four John Doe conspirators seeking recovery of damages and the seizure of domains used by the operation. The allegations against the defendants include violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.

The DCU investigation identified 338 sites used by the operation, which were seized after a court order was granted. Cloudflare assisted with the seizure of the domains. The domain seizures have caused considerable disruption to RaccoonO365’s operation. “To counter RaccoonO365, we acted swiftly to protect our customers and prevent further harm. But criminals constantly evolve, so Microsoft is evolving too,” explained Steven Masada, Assistant General Counsel and Director of Microsoft’s Digital Crimes Unit. “For instance, we are integrating blockchain analysis tools like Chainalysis Reactor into our investigations. These help us trace criminals’ cryptocurrency transactions, linking online activity to real identities for stronger evidence.

The post Microsoft Seizes Sites Used by Popular Phishing Operation to Attack Healthcare Orgs appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office has written to Clark Minor, Chief Information Officer (CIO) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, advising him about the current open cybersecurity and IT management recommendations that require his attention.

GAO is a non-partisan agency that works for Congress and provides support to ensure it meets its constitutional responsibilities and helps improve the performance and ensure the accountability of the federal government. GAO makes recommendations for improving the government’s performance in IT and related IT management functions, including recommendations for the HHS, yet many of those recommendations have yet to be implemented. In the letter, GAO explained that the HHS currently has 82 open recommendations involving high-risk cybersecurity and IT management issues.

GAO made the recommendations over several years, each relating to a GAO High-Risk area: Ensuring the Cybersecurity of the Nation or Improving IT Acquisitions and Management. Out of the 82 recommendations, at least 37 are considered sensitive, and one has been designated as a priority recommendation. GAO explained in the report that in order to secure the cybersecurity of the nation, the HHS needs to take additional steps to secure the records and information systems it uses to carry out its mission.

GAO had recommended that HHS establish a reasonable time frame for when it will be able to digitally accept access and consent forms from properly identity-proofed and authenticated individuals and post those forms on the department’s privacy program website. GAO has warned that until the recommendation is implemented, the HHS will not be able to adequately protect records from improper disclosure.

HHS’ Office for Civil Rights investigations into potential HIPAA violations have resulted in financial penalties for organizations that have failed to maintain logs of activity in information systems containing ePHI, yet it hasn’t fully implemented effective logging of its own systems, as directed by the Office of Management and Budget. “Until HHS implements this recommendation, there is increased risk that the department will not have complete information from logs on its systems to detect, investigate, and remediate cyber threats,” warned GAO. HHS has also not yet implemented the recommendation that it should improve its incident response guidance, implementation, and oversight.

In the Improving IT Acquisitions and Management category, GAO has recommended that HHS improve its management and tracking of IT resources. For instance, the HHS had previously provided a revised time frame for completing its covered Internet of Things (IoT) inventory, but has still not completed the inventory. GAO warned that there is an enormous array of disparate devices that may be considered part of IoT, and those devices connect to HHS information systems. Until HHS has a complete inventory, it lacks visibility into the IoT devices within its environment, which will hamper its ability to mitigate IoT cybersecurity risks.

HHS had made little progress developing a work plan that includes specific actions to show progress in developing a public health situational awareness and biosurveillance network. Doing so will help to ensure that the HHS has comprehensive capabilities to allow a rapid and efficient response to an infectious disease outbreak. GAO also stressed to the HHS CIO that there are also outstanding recommendations from the HHS Office of Inspector General in the areas of cybersecurity and IT acquisitions and management, including requirements under the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014, which must also be resolved.

Minor only joined the HHS in February and has served as CIO since May 2025. The HHS said in that short time, Minor has made steady progress toward ensuring the highest level of security and performance across its systems.

The post GAO: HHS Yet to Implement 82 Cybersecurity and IT Management Recommendations appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) has written to Andrew Ferguson, Chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), requesting the FTC investigate Microsoft and hold it responsible for “gross cybersecurity negligence,” which Sen. Wyden believes has contributed to the barrage of ransomware attacks on critical infrastructure entities.

In the letter, Sen. Wyden cites figures from a February 2025 report published by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) indicating more than 5,000 ransomware attacks in 2024, a 15% increase from 2024, and a 103% increase from 2022. Around half of the victims of those attacks are located in the United States. Those attacks have caused enormous harm to healthcare providers, put patient care at risk, and pose a continuing threat to national security.

Sen. Wyden believes Microsoft is at fault for many of these attacks because of its de facto monopoly on operating systems, combined with dangerous software engineering decisions that have made the Windows operating system vulnerable to ransomware attacks. Sen. Wyden explained that Microsoft chooses the security measures enabled by default in the Windows operating system, and while any user can alter the settings, many do not, as they are unaware of the risks associated with the default security settings.

Cybersecurity Vulnerability Exploited in Ascension Ransomware Attack

Sen Wyden used the 2024 hack of Ascension, one of the largest health systems in the United States, as an example of how easy it is for ransomware groups to breach the networks of critical infrastructure entities. The ransomware group gained access to privileged accounts on Ascension’s Active Directory Server using a privilege escalation technique called kerberoasting, after an Ascension contractor clicked a malicious link in a Bing search result on an Ascension laptop and inadvertently downloaded malware.

The malware provided the attacker with initial access, they moved laterally, and gained administrative privileges to the Microsoft Active Directory Server. The attacker exfiltrated data, then used ransomware to encrypt files. The electronic protected health information of 5.6 million patients was compromised in the attack. The attack was made possible due to a long-standing post-exploitation vulnerability.

Kerberoasting is an attack technique that exploits Microsoft’s continued support for an insecure encryption technology – RC4 – from the 1980s. Microsoft is well aware of the risk from kerberoasting, and how it can be exploited to obtain Active Directory credentials. For more than a decade, cybersecurity experts have warned of the dangers of kerberoasting, yet no action has been taken by Microsoft to mitigate the threat, even though more secure methods of encryption are supported by Windows.

The Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is vastly superior to RC4, is supported by Windows, and recommended by the U.S. government, yet Microsoft does not use AES by default in Windows. The result of that software engineering decision is that hackers with access to a corporate network can exploit the weaknesses in RC4 encryption technology to crack administrators’ privileged accounts.

Sen. Wyden said Microsoft has stated that the risk can be mitigated by setting long passwords of 14 or more characters, yet Microsoft does not require passwords of that length to be set for privileged accounts by default. Sen. Wyden wrote to Microsoft in July 2024, warning about the threat of kerberoasting, and in October 2024, Microsoft published a blog post warning about the vulnerability and how the threat can be mitigated. Microsoft also promised to issue a software update to fix the issue. Almost a year on, and no fix has been forthcoming. Also in October 2024, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued a warning that Iranian hackers were using the kerberoasting technique to attack U.S. organizations.

Despite the technique being used by threat actors, the warning was added to an obscure part of its website and was not promoted. Rather than issue a prominent and easy-to-read warning as requested by Sen. Wyden, the blog post was highly technical in nature. As a result, many companies may not have seen the post or acted on the advice, leaving their crown jewels – Active Directory credentials – at risk.

FTC Action Required to Force Microsoft to Provide Secure Software by Default

Kerberoasting is just one technique that can be used to exploit vulnerabilities. Sen. Wyden provided further examples of Microsoft’s cybersecurity failures that have been exploited by nation-state actors to attack Microsoft customers, including attacks by China in 2023 and, more recently, the vulnerability in Microsoft SharePoint that was mass exploited by hackers linked to the Chinese government this year.

“There is one company benefiting from this status quo: Microsoft itself. Instead of delivering secure software to its customers, Microsoft has built a multibillion-dollar secondary business selling cybersecurity add-on services to those organizations that can afford it,” Sen. Wyden wrote in the letter. “At this point, Microsoft has become like an arsonist selling firefighting services to their victims. And yet government agencies, companies, and nonprofits like Ascension have no choice but to continue to use the company’s software, even after they are hacked, because of Microsoft’s near-monopoly over enterprise IT.”

Sen. Wyden believes that the FTC should take action to hold Microsoft to account, and if no action is taken, Microsoft is likely to continue to deliver dangerous, insecure software to critical infrastructure entities and the government, and further attacks are inevitable.

The post Sen. Wyden Urges FTC to Take Action Against Microsoft for “Gross Cybersecurity Negligence” appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

The U.S. Department of Justice has charged a Ukrainian serial ransomware criminal who is alleged to have been the administrator of multiple ransomware operations. Volodymyr Viktorovich Tymoshchuk, through online monikers including deadforz, Boba, msfv, and farnetwork, is alleged to have been the administrator of the LockerGaga, MegaCortex, and Nefilim ransomware operations between December 2018 and October 2021.

Tymoshchuk, along with his accomplices, conducted or played a key role in ransomware attacks on more than 250 victims in the United States between July 2019 and June 2020 using the LockerGaga and MegaCortex ransomware variants, as well as hundreds of victims worldwide. An international law enforcement operation targeting the LockerGoga and MegaCortex ransomware schemes in September 2022 obtained decryption keys, which were made available to victims via the No More Ransom Project. Many potential victims were able to prevent file encryption after receiving prompt notifications from law enforcement that their networks had been compromised.

Under the Nefilim ransomware scheme, Tymoshchuk and his accomplices claimed many more victims in the United States and worldwide between July 2020 and October 2021. Through those attacks, Tymoshchuk caused millions of dollars in losses due to disruption to business operations, damage to computer systems, and ransom payments. As administrator of the ransomware operations, Tymoshchuk recruited and provided access to the infrastructure and encryptor to conduct attacks.

One of the affiliates of the Nefilim ransomware operation was Ukrainian national Artem Stryzhak, who was arrested in Spain in June 2024 and extradited to the United States on April 30, 2025. Stryzhak has been charged with conspiracy to commit fraud and related activity. Stryzhak primarily targeted companies in the United States, Canada, or Australia that had annual revenues of over $100 million, although a Nefilim administrator encouraged him to target larger companies with more than $200 million in annual revenues. The Nefilim administrators allowed Stryzhak to keep 80% of any ransoms he generated, while they would retain 20%. Any victim who refused to pay had their stolen data leaked on the group’s Corporate Leaks websites.

Tymoshchuk has been charged with two counts of conspiracy to commit fraud and related activity in connection with computers, three counts of causing intentional damage to a protected computer, one count of unauthorized access to a protected computer, and one count of transmitting a threat to disclose confidential information. “Tymoshchuk is a serial ransomware criminal who targeted blue-chip American companies, health care institutions, and large foreign industrial firms, and threatened to leak their sensitive data online if they refused to pay,” said U.S. Attorney Joseph Nocella Jr. for the Eastern District of New York. “For a time, the defendant stayed ahead of law enforcement by deploying new strains of malicious software when his old ones were decrypted. Today’s charges reflect international coordination to unmask and charge a dangerous and pervasive ransomware actor who can no longer remain anonymous.”

The U.S. Department of State is offering up to $10 million as a reward for information leading to the location, arrest, or conviction of Tymoshchuk, plus a further $1 million reward for information that leads to convictions of other members of the LockerGaga, MegaCortex, and Nefilim ransomware groups. The rewards are offered under the Transnational Organized Crime (TOC) Rewards Program.

The post Feds Offer $10 Million Reward for Ransomware Administrator Who Attacked U.S. Healthcare Orgs appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

Healthcare organizations are relatively unlikely to have serious cybersecurity vulnerabilities compared to other industry sectors, as they are generally good at prevention; however, when vulnerabilities are identified, healthcare lags other sectors when it comes to remediation. These are the findings from a recent analysis of penetration testing data and a survey of 500 U.S. security leaders by the Pentest-as-a-service (PTaaS) firm Cobalt. The findings are published in its State of Pentesting in Healthcare 2025 report.

Serious cybersecurity vulnerabilities are relatively rare in healthcare, with the industry ranking 6^th out of the 13 industries represented in the data, with only 13.3% vulnerabilities identified through pentesting qualifying as serious. When penetration tests identify serious vulnerabilities, they need to be remediated promptly. As long as a vulnerability remains unaddressed, it can potentially be exploited by a threat actor.

The standard for measuring the time to perform a security action is the median time to resolve (MTTR), which, for serious vulnerabilities in healthcare, was 58 days. Healthcare ranked 11^th out of 13^th industries on MTTR. Cobalt plotted the frequency of serious vulnerabilities against the resolution rate in a scatterplot chart. Healthcare was the only industry in the struggling sector, with low prevalence but low resolution. The ideal is low prevalence and high resolution.

While the MTTR is a standard measure in security, it can be somewhat misleading, as it is only based on the vulnerabilities that are actually resolved. Cobalt reports that 52% of pentest findings are never resolved. Therefore, to obtain a complete picture, it is also necessary to look at the survival half-life, which is the time taken to resolve 50% of identified vulnerabilities. Having an MTTR of 20 days is excellent, but much less so if half of all serious vulnerabilities are never resolved.

The data show healthcare to be the third-worst industry for half-life score, with a half-life of 244 days, compared to the leading sector, transportation, which has a half-life of 43 days. Education performed worst, with a half-life of 283 days, ahead of hospitality on 270 days. Cobalt notes that the healthcare sector is generally good at prioritizing vulnerability remediation, with the most critical issues usually fixed on time. Almost 40% of healthcare service level agreements (SLAs) require serious vulnerabilities in business-critical assets to be fully resolved within three days, while a further 40% of SLAs require those vulnerabilities to be resolved within 14 days.

Most practices meet the deadlines, with 43% resolving critical findings in one to three days, 37% resolving issues in four to seven days, and 14% resolving issues within eight to fourteen days, although it is common for backlogs to grow in less urgent areas. Healthcare is a heavily regulated industry, with data security requirements under HIPAA. The HIPAA Security Rule requires a risk analysis to be conducted to identify all risks and vulnerabilities to electronic protected health information, which explains, to a certain extent, why there is a low prevalence of serious vulnerabilities. There are also risk management requirements under HIPAA, which are reflected in the data, as 94% of healthcare organizations resolve business-critical issues in less than two weeks.

The slow rates of resolution of vulnerabilities in general and the poor half-life score in healthcare are likely due to a range of factors, such as the continued use of legacy systems, which create technology roadblocks, along with resource constraints. Cobalt also suggests there may be divisions between the departments ordering pentests and the teams implementing fixes, and less mature teams may struggle with the complexity of remediations.

The survey revealed the biggest security concerns in healthcare to be GenAI (71%), third-party software (48%), and exploited vulnerabilities (40%), with the top attack vectors being third-party software (68%), AI-enabled features (45%), and phishing/malware (32%). Given the high level of concern about third-party software, Cobalt recommends that healthcare providers require their vendors to provide comprehensive pentesting reports before procurement. Cobalt also recommends integrating pentesting into the development lifecycle, proactively testing for AI and genAI vulnerabilities, adopting a programmatic approach to offensive security, and conducting regular red team exercises to test real-world detection and response capabilities.

The post Healthcare Industry Good at Preventing Serious Vulnerabilities but Lags in Remediation appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

Cybercriminals have been abusing agentic AI to perform sophisticated cyberattacks at scale, incorporating AI tools throughout all stages of their operations. Agentic AI tools have significantly lowered the bar for hackers, allowing individuals with few technical skills to conduct complex attacks that would otherwise require extensive training over several years and a team of operators.

A new threat intelligence report from Anthropic highlights the extent to which its own language model (LLM) and AI assistant, Claude, has been abused, even with sophisticated safety and security measures in place to protect against misuse. The cybercriminal schemes identified by Anthropic have targeted businesses around the world, including U.S. healthcare providers.

Examples of misuses of Claude code include:

• A campaign allowing large-scale theft of data from healthcare providers, emergency services, religious institutions, and the government
• A large-scale fraudulent employment scheme conducted by a North Korean threat actor to secure jobs at Western companies
• The creation and subsequent sale of ransomware by a cybercriminal with only basic coding skills.

Agentic AI tools can be used to create and automate complex cybercriminal campaigns, requiring little to no coding or technical skills, other than the ability to write prompts to the AI tools. These tools can be embedded into all stages of operations, which Anthropic calls “vibe hacking,” taking its name from vibe coding, where developers instruct agentic AI tools to write the code, while they just guide, experiment, and refine the AI output. Anthropic says vibe hacking marks a concerning evolution in AI-assisted cybercrime.

One such vibe hacking campaign targeted healthcare providers, the emergency services, government entities, and religious institutions. Agentic AI tools were embedded into all stages of the operation, including profiling victims, automating reconnaissance, harvesting credentials, penetrating networks, and analyzing stolen data. Anthropic’s analysis revealed that the threat actor allowed Claude to make tactical and strategic decisions, including determining the types of data to exfiltrate from victims and the creation of psychologically targeted extortion demands.

Claude was used to analyze the victim’s financial records to determine how much to demand as a ransom payment to prevent the publication of the stolen data, and also to generate ransom notes to be displayed on the victims’ devices. Anthropic believes that this campaign used AI to an unprecedented degree. The campaign was developed and conducted in a short time frame and involved scaled data extortion of multiple international targets, potentially hitting at least 17 distinct organizations, resulting in ransom payments that exceeded $500,000 in some cases.

The North Korean campaign used Claude to create elaborate false identities with convincing professional backgrounds to secure employment positions at U.S. Fortune 500 technology companies, and also to complete the necessary technical and coding assessments to secure employment and technical work duties once hired. The ransomware campaign involved the development of several ransomware variants without any coding skills. The ransomware had advanced evasion capabilities, encryption, and anti-recovery mechanisms. In addition to creating ransomware, the threat actor used Claude to market and distribute variants that were sold on Internet forums for $400 to $1,200.

Anthropic has been transparent about these abuses of its AI tools to contribute to the work of the broader AI safety and security community and help industry, government, and the wider research community strengthen defenses against the abuse of AI systems. Anthropic is far from alone, as other agentic AI tools have also been abused and tricked into producing output that violates operational rules that have been implemented to prevent abuse.

After detecting these operations, the associated accounts were immediately banned, and an automated screening tool has now been developed to help discover unauthorized activity quickly and prevent similar abuses in the future. Anthropic warns that the use of AI tools for offensive purposes creates a significant challenge for defenders, as campaigns can be created to adapt to defensive measures such as malware detection systems in real time. “We expect attacks like this to become more common as AI-assisted coding reduces the technical expertise required for cybercrime,” warned Anthropic.

The post Report Reveals Worrying Abuses of Agentic AI by Cybercriminals appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.

One of the biggest security headaches in healthcare is managing third-party risk. Healthcare organizations can implement extensive security measures to protect their internal networks and sensitive data, only for a security flaw in a medical device or third-party software solution to be exploited, circumventing their security protections.

While patches can be applied to address known vulnerabilities, software and firmware may contain third-party components and dependencies. Since there may be little visibility into those components and dependencies, risks are impossible to mitigate effectively.

To improve visibility and help with risk management, all medical devices should be provided with a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), which is a formal, machine-readable inventory of all software components and dependencies used in a medical device. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) now requires SBOMs to be provided with premarket submissions of medical devices, to help ensure cybersecurity for the whole lifecycle of the device.

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is pushing for SBOMs to be included with software to improve transparency and supply chain security. CISA has previously published SBOM guidance, which has now been updated to reflect the current state of maturity in software transparency.

“SBOMs provide a detailed inventory of software components, enabling organizations to identify vulnerabilities, assess risk, and make informed decisions about the software they use and deploy,” explained CISA. “As adoption of SBOMs has grown across the public and private sectors, so too has the need for machine-processable formats that support scalable implementation and integration into broader cybersecurity practices.”

While the guidance  – 2025 Minimum Elements for a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) – is primarily intended for federal agencies, CISA is encouraging other entities to use the guidance to help them understand what they can expect from vendors’ SBOMs. The update includes new SBOM data fields, the name of the tool used to create the SBOM, the software’s cryptographic hash, and several revisions. Public comment is sought on the new draft guidance until October 3, 2025, allowing individuals to share their knowledge for incorporation into the guidance ahead of the release of the final version.

The post CISA Seeks Feedback on Updated Software Bill of Materials Guidance appeared first on The HIPAA Journal.